ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021882
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he wants to be eligible to receive the GI Bill benefits so that he can go to school for his associates degree in culinary art and has already started school. On 12 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021883
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for going AWOL (101119-101209) and for failing to obey a lawful order (101210), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst acknowledges the applicants in-service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021891
He has more than 17 years of service and was denied an administrative board. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080624 Discharge Received: Date: 081107 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: Det 1, 280th ROC, 771st Civil Support Team Unit 27547, Bamberg, Germany Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. While...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021895
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022084
Applicant Name: ????? On 14 October 1997, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022130
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement on his behalf. On 1 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022156
Applicant Name: ????? Total lost time is 151 days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022197
Applicant Name: ????? The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application as to the propriety of the discharge, the analyst determined that the applicants available record of service during the period under review as...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022199
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 3 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022202
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for willfully disobeying a lawful order (101013); and disrespecting a noncommissioned officers (110128), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022203
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022204
Applicant Name: ????? On 10 August 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022206
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for failing to report that SPC L, had given him hashish, and he failed to properly clear SPC E's weapon when coming on the COP McClain, and he also distributed hashis to two other Soldiers with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022213
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for disobeying a lawful order, disrespecting a noncommissioned officer and receiving numerous counselings on divers occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 June 2007, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022215
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022238
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 February 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, serious offense for receiving two DUIs (080713 and 090117), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022244
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states "I was in the Army Reserves in 2007, I was the only female in the unit and felt harassed and uncomfortable with my SGT and he would make sexual advances at me during drills and offer to take me out. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022259
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022333
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct for drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022403
Applicant Name: ????? On 30 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, although a single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022404
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022419
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022441
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative separation board based on the conditional waiver he submitted nor an honorable characterization of service. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: A DD Form 293, orders 221-001 and a DD Form 214.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022443
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 March 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022444
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-AWOL for absenting himself from his unit (AWOL) (101119-101129), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022445
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022515
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 September 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 28 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022539
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 July 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being disrespectful in language towards two noncommissioned officers (060814), disobeying a lawful order (060717), failing to go to his appointed place of duty (060905), testing positive for marijuana (060906), testing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022582
On 23 July 2010, although the separation authority indicated that the Soldier is entitled to a hearing before an administrative separation board, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The Board noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022631
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 May 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived her right to an administrative separation board (was not entitled), and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 6 May 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022636
The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 August 2010, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant submitted a DD Form 149 and the applicant's case will be transferred to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) regarding the aforementioned issue.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022648
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 May 2007, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst noted the applicants issue about his request for an upgrade based on the time that has elapsed since his discharge and the completion of the Rehabilitation Services.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022649
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 110523 Discharge Received: Date: 110629 Chapter: 14, SEC II AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Civil Conviction) RE: SPD: JKB Unit/Location: B Company, 296th BSB, Fort Lewis, WA Time Lost: Civil Confinement for 4 days (101205-101208). On 7 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022650
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board noted that the government introduced the results of a command directed urinalysis into...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022652
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022656
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022913
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 September 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions b. The analyst noted the applicant's contention and the applicants in-service accomplishments and considered the quality of his service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review; however, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to warrant an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022936
On 18 May 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found several mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's characterization of service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022945
Applicant Name: ????? He was granted seven days of leave by the acting commanding officer (CPT B), starting 19 September 2005 through 23 September 2005. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022950
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, for having been charged with burglary and trespassing (111114), failure to report (110506) and (110510), and failure to obey a direct order (110315), (110407), (110513), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022969
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023065
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 12 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions b.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023112
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023135
Applicant Name: ????? The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support a change to the characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023186
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows, that on 27 September 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 18, AR 635-200, by reason of failure toachieve adequate progress in meeting appropriate body fat standards as outlined in AR 600-09, with an honorable characterization of service. Chapter 18 stipulates that Soldiers who fail to meet the body fat standards set forth in Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023295
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 August 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023296
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, at the time of his discharge, he was already being medically discharged. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023357
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test, for being AWOL x 3 (051215-051219, 051117-051118, and 060309-060309), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. These incidents became the circumstances...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023363
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for going AWOL three times, missing movement of her company to Iraq, and a serious record of FTR's, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 April 2007, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023365
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 June 199, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...