Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024847
Original file (AR20110024847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/12/16	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade because he would like to reenlist in the military.  He feels that he would have a better chance of finding a better job when he retires.  Additionally, he never intended to go AWOL.  He simply did not have the funds to return to his unit and was left on his own by his command.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 110721
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110913   Chapter: 10      AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial By Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: HHC, 3 BCT, 25 ID, Schofield Barracks, HI  

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 for a total of 111 days (110321 - 110712), apprehended.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  27
Current ENL Date: 091019    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1  Yrs, 7 Mos, 3 Days Includes 54 days excess leave (110722 - 110913)
Total Service:  		9  Yrs, 9 Mos, 4 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USMC 000626 - 040625/HD
                                       RA       060731 -091018/HD 
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 74D10 Chemical Operations Specialist   GT: 80   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Iraq (060629 - 070911)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, AGCM, NDSM, ICM w/CS, GWOTSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2011, the applicant was charged with AWOL (110321 - 110712).  
       
       On 21 July 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser-included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 17 August 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10   of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's employment issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       At the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service which constitutes a non-waivable disqualification, thus the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 13 June 2012         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement, USMC-11 DD Form 214, ERB, certificate, and a DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
 IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 2    No change 3
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder



















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110024847
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007598

    Original file (AR20120007598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 October 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, the applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004428

    Original file (AR20120004428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 17 August 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant’s issue about his medical conditions; however, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these medical conditions did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110006607

    Original file (AR20110006607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial", the separation code is "KFS", and the reentry code is "RE 4". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023434

    Original file (AR20110023434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 September 2007, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004172

    Original file (AR20110004172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019020

    Original file (AR20110019020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000962

    Original file (AR20120000962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 June 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110006187

    Original file (AR20110006187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 dated 27 march 2011, in lieu of a DD Form 293 and a self authored statement, which was undated. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009158

    Original file (AR20120009158.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions, because he had 4 years of good service in the Army which included a combat tour in Iraq and states he was under psychiatric care. Chapter 10 provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110024672

    Original file (AR20110024672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 8 May 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.