Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023435
Original file (AR20110023435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/12/01	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant's states: "I deployed to Iraq from 12/07 to 03/08.  I subsequently deployed to Afghanistan 11/09 to 11/10.  I was awarded The Good Conduct Medal for these periods of service.  During the latter stages of my Afghan deployment I was late for duty 3 times in 6 weeks.  These were rolled into one offense for which I was chaptered out of the service.  The offense does not justify negating my 2 combat tours and Good Conduct Medal.  I respectfully request my final discharge be upgraded from General to Honorable."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 110317
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110416   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: B Btry, 2/503d Inf Bn (Abn), 173d ABCT, APO AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090923, Dereliction in the performance of his duties by negligently failing operate his MK-19 weapon in a safe manner (090523 and 090524) and stealing personal funds of another Soldier a value of more than $500.00, reduction to E1; forfeiture of $699.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 081112    Current ENL Term: 05 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 05  Mos, 05  Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 10  Mos, 12  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA-070605-081111/HD
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B1P/Infantryman   GT: 94   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Afghanistan (091210-101119) and Iraq (071228-080315)
Decorations/Awards: AAM, AGCM, NDSM, ACM-w/2CS, ICM-w/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR, NATMDL, CIB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed






VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 17 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for being derelict in the performance of his duties (090523 and 090524), for stealing from another Soldier funds valued at more than $500.00 (090810), being late for duty on 5 different occasions, failing to follow orders on 4 different occasions, theft on 2 different occasions, and lying to a senior noncommissioned officer, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.
       
       On 17 March 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 7 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. 
       
       Furthermore, the analyst concluded that the applicant committed many discrediting offenses, which constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of Soldiers in the Army.  Having examined all the circumstances, the analyst determined that the applicant’s numerous incidents of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  These incidents of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       The analyst acknowledges the applicant’s in-service accomplishments and considered the quality of his service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge as shown by the repeated incidents of misconduct or by the multiple negative counseling statements, and the documented actions under Article 15 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.
       
       The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 1 June 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  

























        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder





















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110023435
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 4 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022346

    Original file (AR20110022346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020955

    Original file (AR20110020955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012064

    Original file (AR20060012064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This would change his "Total Service" from 2 yrs, 4 mos, and 18 days, to 2 yrs, 2 mos, and 18 days. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001430

    Original file (AR20070001430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 07 Mos, 22 Days ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028445

    Original file (AR20100028445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has several AWOL's and failed to repair's, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001430aC071031

    On 14 December 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009466

    Original file (AR20120009466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a Military Police Report, dated 22 August 2011 and a GOMOR, dated 22 October 2010. b. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110012827

    Original file (AR20110012827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, for showing a continual disregard for the rules and regulations; having multiple disciplinary infractions over a period of several months which include the following: while at Downer Hall he was counseled after ripping a sink from the wall of a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012309

    Original file (AR20100012309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? She only received a company grade article 15, lost one rank, and all other punishment was suspended. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008967

    Original file (AR20090008967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "This Discharge should of been a General or Honorable court Martial, I pled gulty to the charges, to keep the sentence Limited to a 9 month sentance and NO BDC, I was not adjuicated a BDC or Dishonorable discharge at the time of court Martial." The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the...