Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030427
Original file (AR20100030427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/12/27	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to rejoin the US Army and feels that he has matured since his first stint in the Army. The recruiters told him that he needs his reentry eligibility (RE) code changed in order to get back in the Army. He was hoping that he could get a second chance to serve his country.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 081216
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090128   Chapter: 14-12c (2)      AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: 606th Forward Support Company, 1st Battalion, 377th Field Artillery Regiment, 17th Fires Brigade, Fort Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 081124, disobeyed a lawful order from SGT, a noncommissioned officer (081011), disrespectful in language towards a SGT, a noncommissioned officer (081011), disobeyed a lawful order from SFC, a noncommissioned officer (081011), disrespectful in language towards SFC, a noncommissioned officer (081011), disrespectful in language toward 1SG, a noncommissioned officer (081011), violated a lawful general regulation by wrongfully drinking alcohol while under the age of 21 (081011), forfeiture of $312.00 pay per month for one month, extra duty and restriction for 14 days (CG).

080929, wrongfully used marijuana between (080828-080728), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $670.00 pay per month for 2 months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days, 31 days of restriction suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (090327) (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: Enl/070614    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  9 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 7 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 060124-070613/HD
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88M10 Motor Transport Oper   GT: 96   EDU: HS Grade   Overseas: Korea (070827-080826)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.




VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 5 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used an illegal drug, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 10 December 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 16 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   
       

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to rejoin the US Army and feels that he has matured since his first stint in the Army.  The analyst found that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  The analyst further found no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
       
       Additionally, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 10 August 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 18 December 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100030427
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011639

    Original file (AR20100011639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023921

    Original file (AR20100023921.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 December 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013483

    Original file (AR20060013483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commision of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana (between 19 April-20 May 2005), disrespectful in language towards an NCO on more than one occasion, several failures to go to appointed place of duty, and AWOL (21-23 July 2005; 7-14 August 2005),...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005072

    Original file (AR20120005072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 8 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007710

    Original file (AR20090007710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 9 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008618

    Original file (AR20060008618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 March 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it....

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023238

    Original file (AR20100023238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 January 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, abuse of illega drugs; in that he was punished by a Summary Court-Martial for using an illegal drug, missing formations and disobeying orders from superiors—pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011705

    Original file (AR20090011705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021001

    Original file (AR20090021001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he abused illegal drugs on three occasions and on (080123), he was disrespectful in language and deportment to a 1SG; and failed to be at his appointed place of duty on several occasions, with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016268

    Original file (AR20100016268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 July 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 22 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that...