ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027742
On 9 June 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 8 November 2011.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027790
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027831
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 000721 Discharge Received: Date: 010117 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company E, 169TH Transportation Battalion, 1st Engineer Brigade, Fort Leonard Wood, MO Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (990420-990531) for 42 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027838
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (091112-100116) and AWOL again from (091019-091022), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027939
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028004
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 July 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028013
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor wrongfully useing cocaine on two occasions (050711-050718 and 050920-050927), being absent without leave (051102-051106), and for driving in a reckless manner, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge....
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028016
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028019
On 12 May 2006, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028026
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980330 Discharge Received: Date: 980421 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: A Company, 1/58th Aviation Regiment, 18th Aviation Brigade, Fort Bragg, NC Time Lost: AWOL x 2 from (970818-970913) for 26 days, and AWOL from (980413-980416) for 4 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028028
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for on 11 February 2007, the applicant was found inhaling from a can of Dust Off and received a Field Grade Article 15. On 28 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028085
Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028091
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028096
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was improper because his 6 year contract was already up when he transferred to the 377th Quartermaster Company in Macon, GA. At the time he was debating on rejoining for a few more years, but he decided not to. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was counseled on 16 November 2005, regarding his decision to be separated from the Army Reserve Troop Program Unit (TPU)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028099
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 September 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (080622-080710), and on (080804) he received a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongfully consuming alcohol while a minor, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028191
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 January 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028202
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (071030-071123) and assaulted a female on (070813), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028267
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028414
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028437
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 981008 Discharge Received: Date: 990106 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: C Battery, 1st Battalion, 56th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, Fort Bliss, TX Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (970820-980517) for 271 days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028445
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has several AWOL's and failed to repair's, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028449
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct in the he tested positive for marijuana (091008 and 091104), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028543
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 May 2010, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028550
On 23 April 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 6 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028611
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028681
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028737
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028742
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 16...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028745
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100709 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200 Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: Company H, 232nd Trainee MC, Fort Sam Houston, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028759
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028760
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 October 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment and was provided with the counseling and rehabilitation required by paragraph 11-4, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 28 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028765
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 March 1999, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SPC/E-4 Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028831
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028896
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028909
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 24 months of service with no other adverse action. On 24 August 2006 the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028928
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 9 February 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028951
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I was wrongly accused of recruiter misconduct, I was accused by fellow NCO's whom at the time, where facing charges of recruiter misconduct along with the chain of command, I was moved from the [ redacted ] BN to the [ redacted ] BN, only to face a court Marshall back in the [ redacted ] BN, All the NCO's that I worked with, who also where facing charges had PCS, out of the State of [ redacted ], along...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029085
On 9 July 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029094
On 11 August 2000, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The applicant further contends that it has been 10 years since he left the Army; he was a Union Iron Worker and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029097
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029149
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 October 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029164
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 July 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (100315-100420) and had numerous failures to report, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029273
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was based on one isolated incident in 27 months of service with no adverse action. On 6 April 2010, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029326
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029391
Chapter 3, Section IV, establishes policy and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or bad conduct discharge; and provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029585
The Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to restore former service member's grade, rate or rank. The Board may only change the characterization of service or reason for discharge. Yes No Counsel: [ redacted ] Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (101130); Letter, The American Legion, dated (101208); DD Form 214, dated (050524); Self-Authored Statement; Letter to Congresswoman, dated (101129); Memorandum, Request for Conditional Release, dated (070619);...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029587
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 010425 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: HHS 165th Military Intelligence Battalion, V Corps EU, Darmstadt, Germany, APO AE Time Lost: The DD Form 214, block 29 shows the applicant has a period of lost time from (010401-010418) for 18 days. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029594
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090603 Discharge Received: Date: 090708 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company E, 369th Signal Battalion, Fort Gordon, GA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 (090305-090509) for 65 days. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029820
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029821
On 24 February 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 25 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the...