Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/12/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in over 28 months of service with no other adverse action. He would also like to have his reenlistment code changed so that he can reenlist in the future.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050216
Discharge Received: Date: 050314 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: B Company, 3rd Battalion, 66th Armor, 1st Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Hood, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040712, failed to go to his appointed place of duty (040301), assaulted SGT, a noncommissioned officer (040304), disobeyed a lawful order from SGT, a noncommissioned officer (040304), reduction to Private (E-2), forfeiture of $669.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty for 45 days and restriction for 30 days (FG)
041105, disrespectful in language towards SGT, a noncommissioned officer (041015), extra duty for 14 days (CG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 020319 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 11 Mos, 26 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 11 Mos, 26 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 19K10 M1 Armor Crewmember GT: 107 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Southwest Asia Combat: Iraq (030403-040311)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Company Grade Article 15 for disrespecting a noncommissioned officer, a Field Grade Article 15 for failing to be at his appointed place of duty, disrespecting a noncommissioned officer, disobeying a lawful order, and numerous counseling statements for missing formations and disrespect, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 17 February 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The applicant received a letter of reprimand-for disrespecting a noncommissioned officer dated 2 November 2004, (Administrative).
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in over 28 months of service with no other adverse action. Even though the applicant claims that his offense was an isolated one, the analyst concluded that the applicant committed many discrediting offenses, which constituted a departure from the standards of conduct, expected of soldiers in the Army. Having examined all the circumstances, the analyst determined that the applicants numerous incidents of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline. These incidents of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicants service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant further contends that he would like to have his reenlistment code changed so that he can reenlist in the future. At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 3 August 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: ?????
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 29 November 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100030033
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011421
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you made a false official statement to a SSG, (040304), failed to obey an order from a SGT (040304), disrespect to a 1SG (040305), disobeyed a direct order from a SGT (040329), showed up for formation smelling of alcohol...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016171
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 April 2009, the separation authority approved the discharge action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted seven (7) copies of sworn statements, which was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008135
On 22 December 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006966
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable and the reason for discharge be changed to Secretarial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001377
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004713
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has been counseled numerous times for failing to report, disobeying a lawful order, damaging government property, and receiving two Article 15's, one Field Grade and one Company Grade. On 21 November 2010, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007516
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026270
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 on (100802) for AWOL, wrongfully using marijuana, two violations of disrespecting and disobeying noncommissioned officers and failing to report to his appointed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007710
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012173
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he was disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer on or about 080910; disobeyed a lawful General Order on or about 080817; wrongfully used provoking speeches and gestures towards another Soldier on or about 080817;...