Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024428
Original file (AR20100024428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/09/27	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he request that his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed in order that he may fulfill and keep the honor association between his families name in the US Army. He has since past his childhood indiscrestions and has made his amends.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 001020
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 001201   Chapter: 9       AR: 635-200
Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure	   RE:     SPD: JPD   Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 1st Battalion, 501st Aviation Regiment, Germany APO AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 000419, disrespectful in language towards SGT, a noncommissioned officer on (000306), disobeyed a lawful order from SGT, a noncommissioned officer on (000306), found drunk while on duty on (000306), reduction to Private (E-2), forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (001015), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

000223, resisted apprehension by SSG, a military policeman on (991225), unlawfully struck a female on (991225), drunk and disorderly on (991225), reduction to Private First Class (E-3), forfeiture of $667.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (000820), extra duty for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  25
Current ENL Date: 980513    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Total Service:  		7 Yrs, 2 Mos, 9 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USMCR 930922-931206/NA
                                       USMC   931206-971205/HD
                                       USMCR 971206-980512/NA
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 67T10 UH-60Helicopter Repairer   GT: 109   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany (990830-001201)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM, GCMDL, NDSM, AFEMDL, ASR, L/A

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.



VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record indicates that on 27 March 2000, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure.  On 20 October 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with an honorable discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 24 October 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army.   
       
       Tthe separation authority approved the separation action and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 
       
       The record contains a Military Police Report in reference to the applicant's offenses of; drunk and disorderly, communicating a threat, disrespect to superior noncommissioned officer, simple assault x 2, resisting apprehension, disobeying a noncommissioned officer, provoking speech and gestures, and breach of peace dated 25 December 1999.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.  Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service.  However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, the analyst determined that the discharge is improper.  
       
       The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action.  The analyst noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative separation board.  The analyst determined that denial of an administrative separation board constituted a prejudicial error to the rights of the applicant and the discharge is improper.  
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that partial relief be granted in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 27 May 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 September 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was and is improper.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action and was entitled to an administrative separation board. 

The Board noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative separation board and did not waive it.  The Board determined that denial of an administrative separation board constituted a prejudicial error to the rights of the applicant and the discharge is improper.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 5    No change 0
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding separation (SPD) JFF. 
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change



















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100024428
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018234

    Original file (AR20110018234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 3 September 2009, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. On 2 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharges. On 9 December 2009, the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002020

    Original file (AR20070002020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 10Mos, 24Days (Applicant's DD Form 214 Item 12a "Date Entered AD This Period" incorrectly shows date as: year 98, month 01, day 08, should read year 98, month 04, day 15, information is based on applicant's enlistment contract dated (980415)). Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 February 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002020aC071031

    Original file (AR20070002020aC071031.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 February 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (disobeying a lawful command from a (SGT), driving while drunk on or about 14 October 2000, drunk while on duty 1 November 2000, wrongful use of marijuana between on or about 12 November 2000 and 11 December 2000, and driving while driving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000050

    Original file (AR20120000050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue about his desire to upgrade his discharge for the purpose of being about to join the Army National Guard or Army Reserves.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005766

    Original file (AR20110005766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 101012 Discharge Received: Date: 101218 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPD Unit/Location: 574th Quartermaster Supply Company, 18th Combat Sustainment Support Battalion, APO, AE Germany Time Lost: Military confinement from (101123-101211) for 19 days, as part of the applicant's punishment imposed from a Summary Court-Martial. On 12 October 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020248

    Original file (AR20090020248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010419

    Original file (AR20070010419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 7 April 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017534

    Original file (AR20090017534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 August 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008587

    Original file (AR20090008587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 16 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure for alcohol rehabilitation failure with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001699

    Original file (AR20090001699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf which was not found in the available records. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.