Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/10/28 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states"I enlisted in the army with the intent of making it my career. It is unfortunate that I could not finish the commitment I had made due to a diagnosis of Asthma. I would like to see my discharge status changed to reflect the intent I had to serve my country as a soldier. Currently my discharge status is a black cloud over my head. I want to be able to show that I served without others questioning my character based on the information on my DD214."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 980710 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Failure to Meet Procurement Medical Fitness Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: Company A, 46th AG Battalion, Reception ES, Fort Knox, KY
Time Lost: The type of lost time is unknown; however, the DD Form 214, block 29 shows that under Title 10 USC 972 the applicant accumulated 3 days of lost time from (980609-980611).
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 980528 Current ENL Term: 6 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 1 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Total Service: 0 Yrs, 1 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.
His DD Form 214 indicates he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, with service uncharacterized. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFW (i.e., failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. On 8 July 1998, DA, HQ, US Army Armor Center, Fort Knox, KY, issued Orders 189-0154 discharging the applicant from the Regular Army with an effective date of: 10 July 1998.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, Chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However for Soldiers in entry-level status, it will be uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army, however the applicants record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, for failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with service uncharacterized. In connection with such a discharge, the proceedings of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) would have revealed the applicant had a medical condition which was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty. Subsequently, competent medical authority would have had to approve the findings of the EPSBD. The applicant would have had to agree with the findings and the proposed action for administrative separation from the Army.
A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting that his discharge be changed to general, under honorable conditions so that others will not question his characterization of service, based on information reflected on his DD Form 214. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 18 July 2011 Location: Washinton, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 26 October 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100025381
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015921
Applicant Name: ????? A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012488
However, the record shows that on 29 April 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a right shoulder instability, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. The characterization of service for Soldiers...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019645
Applicant Name: ????? Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008163
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "While my discharged (sic) at basic training in Ft. Leonard Wood Missouri was being processed, I was told that after my enlistment period was completed, I would be able to change the status of my discharge to honorable." Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 990702 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failure to Meet Procurement Medical Fitness...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007973
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012433
Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, with a characterization of service of uncharacterized. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100013522
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I was released for medical reasons, and I feel the service I gave was honorable. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018966
Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a document, subject: Counseling Reference EPSBD Proceedings, in which the Applicant stated he had been counseled about his rights in connection with processing of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) and had been informed he did not meet procurement medical fitness standards at the time of his enlistment. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the Applicants record and his service did not warrant an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016102
Applicant Name: ????? Since my waiver was approved and I was able to join the ARMY I believe that I should not have an Other than Honorable discharge on my record. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014891
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020222 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failed Medical Physical Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.