Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024895
Original file (AR20100024895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/10/28	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states: "The narrative reason for my discharge is listed as parenthood because of the fact that my wife became mentally ill and was unable to care for my infant daughter because of the above I had to take care of my daughter, making it hard for me to go to work and care for my daughter since I had no help and not enough money to pay for the help I needed to care for my daughter.  I feel that I was unfairly discharged since I was separated with no benefits what so ever although I paid into the education system.  Please change my discharge status to honorable."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 010309   Chapter: 5-8    AR: 635-200
Reason: Parenthood	   RE:     SPD: LDG   Unit/Location: 32d Combat Svc Spt Co, Fort Lewis, WA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 990929    Current ENL Term: 03 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	01 Yrs, 05Mos, 11Days ?????
Total Service:  		01 Yrs, 05Mos, 11Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92G10/Food Service Specialist   GT: 90   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Lakeland, FL
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  
       
       His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, for parenthood, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of LDG (i.e., parenthood), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3.
       
       Further, evidence shows that on 1 March 2001, Orders 060-0028, DA, HQ, I Corps and Fort Lewis, Fort Lewis, WA, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date: 9 March 2001.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-8 provides that a Soldier may be separated when parental obligations interfere with fulfillment of military responsibilities.  Specific reasons for separation because of parenthood include inability to perform prescribed duties satisfactorily, repeated absenteeism, late for work, inability to participate in field training exercises or perform special duties such as CQ and Staff Duty NCO, and non-availability for worldwide assignment or deployment according to the needs of the Army.  Unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a Soldier being separated for the convenience of the government will be awarded a character of service of honorable, general under honorable conditions or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  No Soldier will be awarded a characterization of service under honorable conditions under this chapter unless the Soldier is notified of the specific factors in his/her service record that warrant such a characterization, using the notification procedure.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the documents, and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. 
       
       The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       In view of the foregoing, and based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 8 November 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, Court Order, dated 31 August 2000, DD Form 2366, Discharge Certificate from Active Duty, Discharge Certificate from USAR, Discharge Orders from USAR, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100024895
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009782

    Original file (AR20060009782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, and the issues he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007409

    Original file (AR20060007409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 09Mos, 04Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 2 April 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013007

    Original file (AR20060013007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 2...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014488

    Original file (AR20090014488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial with service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009688

    Original file (AR20090009688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015014

    Original file (AR20080015014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of parenthood, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010166

    Original file (AR20090010166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for AWOL (040917-041002 & 041014-041101), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010691

    Original file (AR20080010691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016130

    Original file (AR20090016130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit statements in his own behalf. On 18 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007818

    Original file (AR20080007818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I found myself in a situation where I could either stay and confront a number of civilians with the chance of grievous injury to them and/or myself, or I could remove myself from the situation and avoid confrontation entirely, but in the process of leaving the scene encountered an overzealous local officer who wouldn’t settle for me explaining the situation and passing a field sobriety test, which was proven in court. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. That DD Form 214...