ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000005
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000028
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000043
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst noted the applicant's issues that he would like to have his reentry eligibility code changed to a 3 or a 2, so that he can reenlist back into the Army. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000046
Applicant Name: ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 December 2009.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000092
On 13 January 2009, the separation authority determined that the applicants medical condition was not the direct cause of his misconduct, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000105
Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service, to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000148
Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board noted that the government introduced the results of a command directed urinalysis into the discharge process. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000198
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL for 3 days, disobeyed commissioned and noncommissioned officers, possessed alcohol under age, broke restriction, and wrongfully used marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000199
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. In review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that this condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000203
Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000245
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 May 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: Ms. W. (redacted) City of Melrose Veterans Services City Hall 562 Main Street Melrose, MA 02176 Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: NA VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000274
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 September 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was driving drunk on (010513), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 September 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000282
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, for pattern of misconduct, for writing 13 worthless checks to various businesses in Clarksville, TN totaling approximately $561 (040719-040808), being arrested for the offenses (051016) and spent five days in the county jail; disobeyed an order from...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000293
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor failing to report to his designated place of duty on two occasions (080118, 080130), testing positive for wrongful use of cocaine on two occasions (between 070730-070802 and 080226-080229), with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000303
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000335
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect that he received a traumatic brain injury as a result of car accident. The Department of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board reviewed the resignation for the good of the service in lieu of general court-martial tendered by the applicant. On 5 February 2008, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) accepted the applicants request for resignation in lieu of trail by general court-martial and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000348
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and his self authored statement submitted with the application,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000354
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000371
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12, Paragraph 12-1d, AR 135-178, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive for marijuana (070210), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000389
Applicant Name: ????? On 25 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000417
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that she was driving under the influence of alcohol on or about (060327), driving under the influence of alcohol on or about (070317) and driving under the influence on or about (071208), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000436
Applicant Name: ????? On 2 November 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 9 February 2006, the separation authority reviewed the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be discharged from the Army with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000438
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980212 Discharge Received: Date: 980316 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: B Company, 1st Battalion, 509th Infantry, Fort Polk, LA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (971015-971116) for a total of 33 days. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000441
Simple task are difficult, I have sudden outburst of anger, difficulty sleeping, and thoughts of suicide and have tried to kill myself once since my release. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 October 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor failing to report to his designated place of duty on three occasions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000442
On 20 February 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 22 August 2008, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded the applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000443
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060216 Discharge Received: Date: 060329 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: B Co, 1-14 IN Bn, Schofield Bks, HI Time Lost: 8 days, military confinement (060216-060223) Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): The unit commander's memorandum indicates the applicant received a field grade Article 15 on 19 January 2006, he was reduced to E-1. The intermediate commanders reviewed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000473
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 September 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Company Grade Article 15, on (000629) for assault and for failing to report to his appointed place of duty, a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, dated (000815) for driving under the influence of alcohol, a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000475
On 17 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000477
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was counseled on taking the Anthrax Vaccine and was given a direct order on (000303) to take the Anthrax Vaccine; which he received a Field Grade Article 15 on (000324) for disobeying that direct order, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000480
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000487
Applicant Name: ????? Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000489
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 April 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000495
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (050108-050118), was found in wrongful possession of marijuana on (070507) and disobeyed a lawful general regulation by wrongfully possessing a marijuana pipe, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000507
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 August 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense; in that he was disrespectful to his superior commissioned officer and was found guilty of the offense by a Summary Court-Martial, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 12 September 2000,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000510
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000523
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Additionally, the analyst understands that the applicant was 17 upon enlistment but he met entrance qualification standards to include age. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000547
On 29 August 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000572
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor multiple Articles 15 and failure to respond to counseling statements demonstrating his inability to rehabilitate, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 12 May 2008, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000583
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the applicant's reentry eligibility (RE) code, which is tied to the narrative reason for discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000587
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000588
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 October 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 29 December 2009.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000608
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000611
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 May 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was found guilty at a trial by Summary Court-Martial for having used marijuana, and recommended that the applicant be separated from the Army with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000614
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 991116 Discharge Received: Date: 000114 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: C Company, 1st Battalion, 24th Infantry, Fort Lewis, WA Time Lost: AWOL x 2 from (990302-990331) for a total of 30 days, the mode of return is unknown, and AWOL from (990617-990906) for a total of 82 days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000617
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 July 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully using a controlled substance on numerous occassions, on or between 12 October 1998 and 4 May 1999, to wit: marijuana and cocaine, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 13 August 1999, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000618
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he was arrested twice for driving under the influence, his first DUI was (090404) and the second DUI was (090703), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000693
Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/30 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000712
By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his farther's testimony and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief....
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000720
Applicant Name: ????? On 4 October 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Chanbe RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000756
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.