Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/30 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documents submitted with the application.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: Not in File (NIF)
Discharge Received: Date: 050610 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: B Btry, 1-320 FA Bn, Fort Campbell, KY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None in the record. However, the applicant admits to having received an Article 15 for failing a urinalysis.
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 020530 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 11Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 11Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 13B10/Cannon Crewmember GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: SWA Combat: Kuwait/Iraq (030228-040218)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, GWOTSM, NDSM, ICM, ASR, OSR-2, AAB
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Bedford, MA
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 28 April 2005, the applicant was charged with wrongful use of ecstasy (050114-050119). On 28 April 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit and intermediate commanders recommendations are not contained in the available record. On 31 May 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
This recommendation was made after full consideration of the former Soldiers faithful and honorable service, as well as the record of misconduct. The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the applicants characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst noted that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his one year combat tour in Iraq, and his awards of the Army Commendation and Army Achievement medals, mitigated the discrediting entries in the service record.
Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be partially upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. However, the reason for discharge remains both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 8 March 2010 Location: Washington, D.C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: Ms. W. (redacted)
City of Melrose Veterans Services
City Hall
562 Main Street
Melrose, MA 02176
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his service to include his combat service and as a result it is inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 5 No change 0
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100000245
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015312
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009641
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010610
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004718
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on16 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, commission of a serious offense because he received a company grade Article 15 on (050120) for dereliction of duty and treating an NCO with contempt and testing positive for marijuana on (050114), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 March 2005, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011878
Applicant Name: ????? Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040919 Discharge Received: Date: 050515 Chapter: 8-26e(2) NGR: 600-200 Reason: Acts or Patterns of Misconduct RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 972d Military Police Co (716), Melrose, MA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002570
The applicant's chain of command recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 27 April 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicants issues that his discharge proceedings began prior to 180 days of active service and his characterization of service should have been uncharacterized; however, the evidence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090007154
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015108
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004050
It indicates that the applicant was discharged from the Massachusetts Army National Guard under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26k, NGR 600-200, for unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reentry eligibility code of 3. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Discussion,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006491
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.