Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that in order to reenlist in the Army, he needs this upgrade to his discharge.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060113
Discharge Received: Date: 060626 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: Maintenance Troop, Regimental Support Squadron, 2nd Stryker Cavalry Regiment, Fort Lewis, WA
Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (060104-060105) for a total of 2 days. The applicant returned to his unit.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060512, disobeyed a lawful command from LTC, his superior commissioned officer on or about (060408); forfeiture of $636.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)
Article 15, 060525, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (060405-060504); forfeiture of $636.00 pay per month for two months, suspended and will be automatically remitted if not vacated before (061101); and extra duty for 45 days, suspended and will be automatically remitted if not vacated before (061101) (FG)
Article 15, 060119, without authority, absent himself from his unit on or about (060104-060105); reduction to Private (E-1); suspended to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (060219); forfeiture of $297.00 pay per month for one month; suspended to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (060219); and 14 days extra duty (CG)
Article 15, 060328, disobeyed a lawful order from 1SG, a noncommissioned officer on or about (060304); disobeyed a lawful order from SGT, a noncommissioned officer on or about (060304); and wrongfully possessed alcohol while under the age of 21 on or about (060304); reduction to Private (E-1); forfeiture of $714.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 050419 Current ENL Term: 4 Years 23 Weeks/The applicant required a moral waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (050328)
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 2 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Total Service: 1 Yrs, 2 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 63B10 R4 Wheeled Vehicle Mech GT: 110 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 13 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL for 3 days, disobeyed commissioned and noncommissioned officers, possessed alcohol under age, broke restriction, and wrongfully used marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 June 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to reenlist in the Army; however, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 15 September 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 December 2009.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100000198
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025603
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012645
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011528
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021942
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020248
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014128
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used illegal drugs; failed to be at his appointed place of duty on numerous occasions, disrespectful to a noncommissioned officer, and violating barracks policy, with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017630
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 18 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100006987
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 April 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving an Article 15 on 090311, having received three counseling statements regarding action that violated the UCMJ, late to PT formation and failure to be at her appointed place of duty (090323), lied to a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011954
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090021877
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...