Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/28 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge should be changed because he served his country in a time of war and did everything and anything to protect his country and fellow Soldiers during that time. He made a mistake in his time back in the states, and regret his mistake, and need the change in his discharge to help better himself, to get a chance to go to college and show that he is a better man. The US Military taught him a lot, from discipline and integrity, and he puts those values to use everday in the civilian world. Everyone deserves a second chance in life and he is asking for his chance to redeem himself.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050502
Discharge Received: Date: 050512 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: Service Battery, 2nd Battalion, 5th Field Artillery, Fort Sill, OK
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050428, wrongfully used amphetamine between on or about (050309-050316); d-methamphetamine between on or about (050309-050316); methamphetamine between on or about (050309-050316); and wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (050309-050316); reduction to the grade of Private (E-1); forfeiture of $617.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (051027); (FG)
Article 15, 050302, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (050118-050125); reduction to the grade of Private (E-2); forfeiture of $500.00 pay, forfeiture of $692.00 pay, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050901); extra duty and restriction for 45 days, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050901); (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 24
Current ENL Date: 021107 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 13B10 Cannon Crewmember GT: 101 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Southwest Asia Combat: Iraq (030411-040317)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, GWOTSM, GWOTEM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 2 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; drug abuse, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he served his country in a time of war and did everything and anything to protect his country and fellow Soldiers during that time. He made a mistake in his time back in the states, and regrets his mistake, and needs the change in his discharge to help better himself, to get a chance to go to college and show that he is a better man.
The analyst considered the applicants quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review. However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge.
Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 17 September 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 18 December 2009.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100000028
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007957
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge and reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013361
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used marijuana, drove a passenger car without a license and went AWOL, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 2 May 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004001
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 16 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015487
On 14 August 2003, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action; and indicated if discharged, recommend approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and he further recommended that the discharge action be suspended for 6 months and to be automatically remitted if not sooner vacated. On 30 December 2003, the separation authority vacated the suspension of the approved separation; waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008508
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000419
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 October 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017657
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011020
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002384
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 May 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he abused illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011736
Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 645-200, by reason of misconduct with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense) and the separation code is "JKK." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...