Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000028
Original file (AR20100000028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/28	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his discharge should be changed because he served his country in a time of war and did everything and anything to protect his country and fellow Soldiers during that time. He made a mistake in his time back in the states, and regret his mistake, and need the change in his discharge to help better himself, to get a chance to go to college and show that he is a better man. The US Military taught him a lot, from discipline and integrity, and he puts those values to use everday in the civilian world. Everyone deserves a second chance in life and he is asking for his chance to redeem himself. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 050502
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050512   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: Service Battery, 2nd Battalion, 5th Field Artillery, Fort Sill, OK 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050428, wrongfully used amphetamine between on or about (050309-050316); d-methamphetamine between on or about (050309-050316); methamphetamine between on or about (050309-050316); and wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (050309-050316); reduction to the grade of Private (E-1); forfeiture of $617.00 pay per month for two months; extra duty and restriction for 45 days, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (051027); (FG)

Article 15, 050302, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (050118-050125); reduction to the grade of Private (E-2); forfeiture of $500.00 pay, forfeiture of $692.00 pay, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050901); extra duty and restriction for 45 days, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050901); (FG) 

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 021107    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 13B10 Cannon Crewmember   GT: 101   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (030411-040317)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, GWOTSM, GWOTEM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 2 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; drug abuse, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he served his country in a time of war and did everything and anything to protect his country and fellow Soldiers during that time.  He made a mistake in his time back in the states, and regrets his mistake, and needs the change in his discharge to help better himself, to get a chance to go to college and show that he is a better man. 
       
       The analyst considered the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge.  
       
       Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 17 September 2010         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 18 December 2009. 

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100000028
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007957

    Original file (AR20100007957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge and reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013361

    Original file (AR20090013361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used marijuana, drove a passenger car without a license and went AWOL, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 2 May 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004001

    Original file (AR20090004001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 16 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015487

    Original file (AR20110015487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 August 2003, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action; and indicated if discharged, recommend approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and he further recommended that the discharge action be suspended for 6 months and to be automatically remitted if not sooner vacated. On 30 December 2003, the separation authority vacated the suspension of the approved separation; waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008508

    Original file (AR20100008508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000419

    Original file (AR20110000419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 21 October 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090017657

    Original file (AR20090017657.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 May 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011020

    Original file (AR20100011020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002384

    Original file (AR20110002384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 May 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he abused illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011736

    Original file (AR20090011736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 645-200, by reason of misconduct with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Serious Offense)” and the separation code is "JKK." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to:...