Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2009/12/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade so that he can either obtain a government job or reenlist.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 021002 Chapter: 13-2f AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Standards RE: SPD: JFT Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Battery, US Army Air Defense Artillery Center, Fort Bliss, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 17
Current ENL Date: 001108 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 10 Mos, 25 Days ?????
Total Service: 1 Yrs, 10 Mos, 25 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92Y10 Unit Supply Spec GT: 95 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFT (i.e., physical standards) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." Further, the evidence of record shows that on 2 October 2002, DA, HQ, US Army Air Defense Artillery Center, Fort Bliss, TX, Orders 275-0006 discharged the applicant from the Regular Army with an effective date of 2 October 2002.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13-2e of this regulation, states in pertinent part, that separation proceedings will be initiated for Soldiers without medical limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test. The reason for discharge will be shown as unsatisfactory performance. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army. However, the applicants record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is requesting an upgrade so that he can obtain a government job or reenlist. If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
Additionally, the burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 17 September 2010 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 December 2009.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100000046
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023364
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, paragraph 13-2f by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000751
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: ?????
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110002231
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 October 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, paragraph 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing three consecutive Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFTs), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: [ redacted ] Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (110126); IDVA Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008012
I received my Discharge papers a few weeks later and I seen that I had been discharged General, Under Honorable Conditions. I was in the military a total of nine years and six months, and in that time I failed two consecutive Physical Training test not more than forty-five days apart. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010825
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014296
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I received a Chapter 5, AR 635-200, and Chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance with characterization of service, General under Honorable, for being unable to pass the physical fitness test. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012921
Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure of the Army Physical Fitness Test will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue she submitted, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to fully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003702
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for several APFT failures, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant waived his right to legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023845
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 February 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, and for failing to achieve the minimum Army standards on the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT), with an uncharacterized discharge. Certification Signature Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016867
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Physical Standards" with the...