ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000048
The rating period is that period within the "Period Covered" during which the rated officer serves in the same position under the same rater who is writing the report. There were three distinct types of nonrated periods: (a) periods, regardless of the number of days, between the date an officer departs one duty position and begins performance in a new duty position; (b) periods, regardless of the number of days, spent performing in a duty position during which the rated officer or the rater...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000420
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Form 2627) from the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Paragraph 3-43 of the military justice regulation contains guidance on the transfer or removal of records of nonjudicial punishment (DA Form 2627) from the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000422
The evidence of record shows that an error was made during the preparation of the applicant’s enlistment contract, which resulted in an incorrect pay grade being shown on his DD Form 4/1. The evidence of record shows that an error was made during the preparation of the applicant’s enlistment contract, which resulted in an incorrect pay grade being shown on his DD Form 4/1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000425
Richard G. Sayre | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows that an error was made during the preparation of the applicant’s enlistment contract, which resulted in an incorrect term of service being shown on his DD Form 4/1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his enlistment contract (DD Form 4/1)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000439
Richard G. Sayre | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Further, the implementation instructions for the FSGLI program clearly stipulated that in the case of married couples on active duty, premiums would be automatically deducted from each spouse’s pay for coverage of his or her spouse. Absent any evidence of record showing the applicant and/or his spouse complied with the DEERS registration procedures and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000756
The applicant did not deny taking the civilians at the World Bank to the PX. He first told the IO he never bought anything for World Bank personnel. The World Bank Director said SFOR Soldiers have power over Bosnian women and that asking them out is sexual harassment.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060000862
Loans that qualify for repayment are Guaranteed Student Loan/Stafford Loans, National Direct Student Loan/Perkins Loans, William D. Ford Loans, Supplemental Loans for Students, Federally Insured Student Loans (FISL), Parent Loan for Undergraduate Students (PLUS), Auxiliary Loan Assistance for Students (ALAS), and consolidated loans which fall under Title IV, Part B or E of the Higher Education Act of 1965, or William D. Ford Loan. The applicant’s military records may be corrected to show...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060001175
Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst | The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated 20 October 2005. In January 2006, new information was received from Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) officials indicating that HRC action had been taken on the applicant that resulted in his reenlistment being antedated to 7 January 2005 for a period of 4 years, instead of the 3 years indicated in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060001526
Richard G. Sayre | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Further, that no refunds for FSGLI premiums that are automatically collected is authorized. Absent any evidence of record showing the applicant and/or his spouse complied with the DEERS registration procedures and declination provisions of the Army’s FSGLI implementation instructions, there is insufficient evidence to show any error or injustice related to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060001530
Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides his BSM orders and award certificate; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award); his MSM orders and award certificate; and orders revoking the MSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division Permanent Orders #019-01...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060001682
The applicant provides his college transcripts; pages 1 – 3 of a 4-page NGB Form 62-E (Application for Federal Recognition as an Army National Guard Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the Army National Guard of the United States) dated 13 May 2004; an Officer Candidate School (OCS) certificate of completion; Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders 343-271 dated 8 December 2004; a corrected copy...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060001687
For these reasons, he would like the opportunity to repay his scholarship debt of $5,960.00 instead of going on active duty. The CJA indicated that although the command recommended the applicant’s order to active duty, she was recommending repayment of the scholarship monies in lieu of being ordered to active duty based on the significant delays in processing the case. In all similar ROTC breach of contract cases reviewed by this Board, the initial disenrollment letter includes an option...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060002700
The applicant submitted, in support of his request, a copy of the DD Form 2475, DoD Educational Loan Repayment Program (LRP) Annual Application, dated 22 August 2003; a USAREC Form 1150-R-E, Statement of Understanding – Army Policy, USAREC Addendum to DD Form 1966 Series, dated 4 November 2002; a DD Form 2366, Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984 (MGIB), dated 4 November 2002; a DA Form 3286-67, Statement of Understanding (Army Policy), dated 4 November 2002; a USAREC Form 1232, Loan Repayment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060002994
Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request to correct the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election to former spouse coverage. Counsel states that the previous Board stated: "Absent consent of the widow to correct the FSM's records to provide for former spouse coverage in lieu of spouse coverage, to grant the applicant's request at this date would constitute...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060003324
The applicant requests, in effect, that an erroneously published Good Conduct Medal permanent orders and a revocation of these permanent orders be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's motive for requesting removal of the erroneously published permanent order and the revocation of these permanent orders is to clear his file to make it easier for the promotion selection board to review his files. The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060003329
On 26 April 1968, the separation authority approved the separation action on the applicant and directed that he receive an UD. The applicant's contention that his overall record of service, and post service good conduct support an upgrade of his discharge, and the supporting documents he submitted were carefully considered. The evidence confirms the applicant had an extensive disciplinary history throughout the time he served, which included the time he served in the RVN.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000110C080324
The applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, Paragraph 4-24B(3), AR 635-40 by reason of disability, severance pay, with service uncharacterized. The PEB would have recommended separation with severance pay. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000120C080324
On 29 July 2005, the separation authority approved separation with an uncharacterized discharge. The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000121C080324
The entire chain of command recommended approval of the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial with an other than honorable conditions discharge. On 9 August 2005, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed he be discharged from the Army with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000124C080324
The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army. That DD Form 214 indicates that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000129C080324
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000133C080324
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 7 August 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000134C080324
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 4 June 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (Summary Court-Martial on six charges of failure to report, Company Grade Article 15 for adultery, supplementary punishment for failure to report, and another Company Grade Article 15 for being absent without leave), with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000135C080324
On 14 November 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000136C080324
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged from the regular Army under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of expiration term of service, with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when separated in entry- level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000143C080324
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 May 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000150C080324
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000151C080324
His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-26g(2), NGR 600-200, erroneous enlistment or extension, with service characterized as Honorable, and a re- entry eligibility (RE) code of '3'. The NGB Form 22 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-26g(2), NGR 600-200, by reason of erroneous enlistment or extension, with service characterized as Honorable, and a re- entry eligibility (RE) code of '3'. Therefore, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000153C080324
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 January 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000156C080324
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020710 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKB Unit/Location: Time Lost: The applicant was confined by the civilian authorities for a total of 362 days, from (001117-011114). Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Section II, AR 635-200, by reason of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000158C080324
On 16 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant’s service to include combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000159C080324
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change No change (Character) Change No change (Reason) (Board member names available upon request) IX. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000162C080324
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document he submitted, the analyst recommend that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Yes No Counsel: Yes Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted a statement in support of his personal appearance hearing. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000164C080324
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000255C080324
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000388
The applicant concludes he has learned from his past mistakes as a Soldier and a man. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000715
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000727
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 September 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (failure to pass the APFT on numerous occassions and no improvement in the events in which he was deficient), with an honorable discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000728C080324
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change No change (Character) Change No change (Reason) (Board member names available upon request) IX.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000731
Application Receipt Date: 060113 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to uncharacterized and reentry elgibility "RE" code. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of this prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060001403
On 920721 the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, it is recommended that the applicants request for an upgrade of his characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060001854
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 19 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002388
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002391
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002392
Application Receipt Date: 060214 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as result it is now inequitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002393
Application Receipt Date: 060214 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 08Mos, 23Days ????? The applicant's chain of command recommended approval for involuntary release from active duty and discharge from USAR Commission with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002394
The applicant had a period of AWOL (990806-990812), which he received a Field Grade Article 15, however, this period is not listed on DD Form 214 item 29, dates of time lost during this period. On 5 May 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002396
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 20 November 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002397
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 12 January 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (he tested positive for cocaine and marijuana), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002398
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 061222 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...