SUPPLIMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 9 February 2006
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060001175
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual. A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation. The findings appearing in
proceedings dated AR20050002369 were affirmed. The following additional
findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the Board.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated 20 October 2005.
| |Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Mark W. Schaefer | |Member |
| |Mr. Ronald S. Venable | |Member |
The Board considered the following additional evidence:
Exhibit C – Human Resources Command (HRC) Memorandum, dated
17 May 2005, pertaining to the Record of Proceedings AR200500023659, dated
20 October 2005.
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:
4. In January 2006, new information was received from Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) officials indicating that HRC action had been
taken on the applicant that resulted in his reenlistment being antedated to
7 January 2005 for a period of 4 years, instead of the 3 years indicated in
the recommendation contained in Army Board for Correction of Military
Records (ABCMR), Record of Proceedings (Docket Number AR20050002369), dated
20 October 2005.
5. On 17 May 2005, the Chief, Force Alignment Division, HRC, in a
memorandum to the Commander, 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, Hunter
Army Airfield, Georgia, approved cancellation of the applicant’s 30
December 2004 reenlistment for a period of 3 years; and recommended
approval of antedating the applicant’s reenlistment to 7 January 2005 for a
period of 4 years.
6. Based on the 17 May 2005 HRC memorandum, the applicant’s unit effected
an antedated reenlistment contract on the applicant that reenlisted him for
a period of 4 years on 7 January 2005.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
3. At the time of the decision of the ABCMR decision contained in Docket
Number AR20050002369, dated 20 October 2005, it was the intent of the ABCMR
to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should
properly have been at the time.
4. The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20050002369 was based on the
information and recommendation contained in a 22 March 2005 HRC advisory
opinion provided to the Board, which recommended antedating the applicant’s
reenlistment to 7 January 2005 for a period of 3 years. Subsequent HRC
action resulted in the applicant’s reenlistment being antedated to 7
January 2005 for a period of 4 years, instead of 3 years as originally
recommended. As a result, implementation of the original Board
recommendation by the DFAS would result in a less favorable outcome for the
applicant. Therefore, it would be unjust to implement the original Board
recommendation.
BOARD VOTE:
___MKP _ __MWS_ __RSV__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
revocation of the original Board recommendation contained in ABCMR Docket
Number 20050002369, dated 20 October 2005, which will allow the antedated
reenlistment of 7 January 2005 for a period of 4 years already effected on
the applicant to remain in effect.
____Margaret K. Patterson____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |A2006001175 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2006/02/09 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. 1021 |100.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003865C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment contract be antedated to show that he reenlisted prior to completing 16 years of military service. When the Commander, USA HRC has authorized a reenlistment to be antedated, the DA-authorized date will be entered in Items 5 of DD Form 4/1, and 13c and 14f of DD Form 4/2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by filing in the applicant's Official Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003863C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment contract be antedated to show that he reenlisted prior to completing 16 years of military service. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of DD Form 4 Series (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States), with an effective date of 30 September 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by filing in the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001868C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be given an antedated reenlistment contract in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) in order to allow the reinstatement of his Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) payments. Further, it is clear USAR personnel officials support granting the applicant full relief based on the administrative errors made in the processing of his physical examination, as evidenced by the recommendation contained in the HRC, St....
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050006220
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Memorandum; Battalion Commander Memorandum of Support; DA Form 4836, dated 13 March 2003; Enlistment/Reenlistment Contract (DD Form 4, dated 18 May 1997; and Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2A). Table 2-3 outlines the authorized periods of reenlistment for USAR TPU Soldiers, and paragraph 2-4 contains guidance on the USAR Indefinite Reenlistment Program. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003298
The applicant states approval was granted to issue an antedated reenlistment contract and mistakes were made on the two contracts that are presently reflected on his iPERMS record that authorized him to reenlist on 30 September 2010 for a period of 6 years. Accordingly, a new antedated contract was authorized on 21 October 2011 and signed on 10 January 2012. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016150
The applicant requests, in effect, change of the place entered active duty (PLEAD) and home of record (HOR) on her mobilization orders dated 3 January 2005, 4 January 2006, and 3 January 2007. The applicant's record contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record Armed Forces of the United States) executed in conjunction with her 9 July 2004 enlistment that shows her HOR as: 3-- N---- 1-- W---, Fillmore, Utah 84631. In an 8 January 2009 letter SSG N----- E--- stated he was instructed to use the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016340C070206
He states that he believes that the effective date of his antedated Enlistment Contract should be 21 February 2005 and not 3 August 2004. The director stated that the applicant's ETS date was 2 August 2004 according to his Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment dated 24 July 2003, and that the memorandum approving the antedated reenlistment directed that the Department of the Army authorized date of 3 August 2004 would be used when preparing the DD Form 4/1. The director indicated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013950
The policy also set forth the eligibility criteria, which included, in pertinent part, the Soldier must be a Dual Status military technician serving in-theater in Iraq, Afghanistan or Kuwait in support of Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom; must not have more than 16 years total military service upon ETS; must be fully eligible to reenlist or extend; and must execute a reenlistment or voluntary extension of enlistment while serving on active duty in theater. The evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007809
It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. With respect to any financial hardship, while the Board is sympathetic to this issue, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued an order to active duty, an order for his release from active duty, and a DD Form 214 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014902
c. Chapter 3 (Board Schedules and Procedures), Section III (Promotion Reconsideration Boards), paragraph 3-22 (Correction of military records as a result of a special selection board action), provides, if the report of a special selection board, approved by the President, recommends for promotion to the next higher grade an officer not currently eligible for promotion, or a former officer whose name was referred to it, the Secretary of the Army may act through the Army Board for Correction...