Application Receipt Date: 060105
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant request upgrade of his General under honorable conditions discharge to Honorable. The applicant feels his discharge was improper for many reasons. He continues by stating he was young and anxious to serve his country and perform his duties as a Soldier. Four months after basic training he was in Iraq, a wartime environment and did not know what to expect. The applicant further states because of his combat experiences he has anger and anxiety disorders which caused him to make mistakes he has learned from. He has seen by doctors at the VA Hospital for physical and mental problems, he enrolled in anger management classes as well. The applicant concludes he has learned from his past mistakes as a Soldier and a man.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer:
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040924
Discharge Received: Date: 041020
Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct
RE: SPD: JKA
Unit/Location:
Time Lost: AWOL, 17 Days (031224)-(040111) Applicant returned to unit.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): AWOL-040819; Reduction to E2 suspended, automatically remitted if vacated before 18 Dec 04, Forfieture of $311.00, suspended, automatically remitted if vacated before 18 Dec 04, extra duty and restriction for 14 days, (Company Grade.)
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB:
Current ENL Date: 020730 Current ENL Term: 3 Years
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 2 Days
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 2 Days
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 19k10 GT: 97 EDU: HS GRAD Overseas: Iraq Combat: Iraq
Decorations/Awards: GWOTEM, GTOTSM, NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: He has obtained a life/health insurance producers license from , will continue to change his life for the positive. He enrolled in anger management classes. Desires to go to college and as a man, civilian live up to the good citizen he is and will continue to be. Provided eight names of personnel that he claims have personal knowledge of his exemplary post service accomplishments.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
Evidence of record shows that on , the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 4 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of General, under honorable conditions.
The applicant was Flagged on (), in his OMPF.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After careful review of all the applicant's military records during the period of enlistment under review, and the additional issues he submitted. The analyst found that the discharge was inequitable; based on the overall length of the applicant's service, medical circumstances surrounding the discharge and his combat tour. In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority is recommended. This action does not entail a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 060323
Location:
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes
Counsel: Yes
Witnesses/Observers: Yes
Exhibits Submitted: Yes
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change (Character)
Change No change (Reason)
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was inequitable based on the applicant's overall length of service, medical circumstances surrounding discharge and his combat tour.
Case report reviewed and verified by:
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority
Other: None
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
DATE: 060407
Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011653
The applicant waived consultation with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 14 August...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015407
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 5 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014001
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor pattern of misconduct: on two known occassions you altered official documetns and falsified information on an official records with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008794
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (serious offense)for theft of 40,000 Korean Won, for being AWOL, under age drinking, engaging in prostitution, and for failure to pay debts, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110013609
Issue 1: The applicant was a good Soldier and her superiors failed to consider her complete service record. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found several mitigating factors which would merit a partial upgrade of the applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. In review of the applicant's entire...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015482
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 20 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (disrespected a noncommissioned officer X 3, on or about (040416, 050128, 050503); disrespected and disobeyed a noncommissioned officer on or about (050128); left her place of duty, and disobeyed a noncommissioned officer on or about (051011)), with...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015444
On 20 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011762
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an honorable discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007747
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change No change (Character) Change No change (Reason) (Board member names available upon request) IX. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010714
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 May 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.