ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015101
The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552), dated 21 February 2000, which shows that the applicant requested "to be considered for advancement to next higher grade." Her records also contain a copy of Headquarters, Board for Correction of Military Records, Arlington, Virginia, memorandum, dated 28 June 2000, which shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015103
(As a result, the Regional Personnel Actions Division, Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, indicated that it had administratively corrected the applicant's records to show 3 years of constructive service credit; however, in doing so, actually only credited the applicant with 2 years and 364 days of constructive credit (i.e., 14 January 1981), not 3 years of constructive credit (i.e., 13 January 1981).) On 22 January 2004, the USAR ANC PM provided an advisory opinion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015105C070205
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three (CW3) by special selection boards (SSB). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to duly constituted special selection boards for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer three...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015112
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015112 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board acknowledged in its previous decision that there was evidence that he had been treated for burns while in Vietnam and concluded that there was no evidence to show that the burns were the resultant cause of enemy...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015118C071108
Counsel requests, in effect, that the general court-martial conviction be deleted from the applicant’s military records. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015122
The applicant requests, in effect, that the date of her MASP (Medical Additional Special Pay) contract be adjusted 2 months from 14 September 2004 to 14 July 2004, the date of her entry on active duty. Information herein was obtained from the advisory opinion, dated 11 December 2006, rendered by the Chief, Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Special Pay Branch, Office of The Surgeon General (OTSG), that stated a review of the applicant's military pay account indicated that she entered active...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015123
AHRC stated that the applicant was requesting an adjustment to his MSG DOR from 27 December 2005 to 1 February 2002. Promotions were made through his sequence number on 1 February 2002; however, the applicant did not meet the security clearance requirement for promotion to MSG. AHRC stated that on 18 January 2006, the applicant was promoted to MSG with an effective date and DOR of 27 December 2005, the day his security clearance was granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015130
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a dishonorable discharge on 8 March 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial. The applicant provided four character reference letters from four instructors at the National Aviation Academy. Section 1552(f), Title 10, United States Code states that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records can only review records of court-martial and related administrative records to correct a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015132C071108
Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Korea on 6 November 1950, awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 18 May 1949 through 4 August 1952, and awarding the applicant the Republic of Korea -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015133
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015133 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. While the record does not specifically state that the applicant served in active ground combat, the fact that he was assigned as an infantryman in an infantry specialty in Vietnam during five campaign periods and was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015137
On 13 February 1980, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be issued a discharge certificate under other than honorable conditions. On 5 August 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015141C071029
By 1st endorsement dated 1 November 1972, NGB informed the NYARNG that inasmuch as the applicant had elected to accept his promotion whether it be in the ARNG or in the USAR, it was necessary that he be either promoted in the NYARNG or transferred to the appropriate USAR control group for the purpose of accepting his promotion in the USAR. By letter to NGB dated 14 January 1975, the applicant stated he was not granted his expressed options in 1971 or 1972 although he was selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015148
The FSM was discharged from the Army National Guard on 5 October 1995 and was assigned to the Retired Reserve. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. The FSM and the applicant were married in December 1971 and divorced on an unknown date.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015155 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant, as the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her late father be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015180
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. It provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial; and that the appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015201
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015201 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with the period ending 3 March 1970 to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015205 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015210
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015210 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The regulation also states that the amount of foreign service will be taken from the Soldiers Enlisted Qualification Record or, if necessary, verified from the Soldiers Military Personnel Records Jacket. Since there is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015212
The applicants Service Record shows he was promoted to SGT (T) on 18 January 1954. His DD Form 214 shows he was separated in the rank of SGT (T) with a date of rank of 18 June 1954. However, his Service Record shows he was promoted to SGT (T), E-5 on 18 January 1954 and his Enlisted Qualification Record shows his pay grade status as E-5 on 18 January 1954.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015213
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code. On 29 April 1998, the colonel serving as Commander, Operations Group, Combat Maneuver Training Center (Germany), approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, and, in pertinent part, directed she receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) provides, in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015217
The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. Evidence of records shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 September 1964 and was honorably discharged on 8 September 1965 after completing 1 year of creditable active service. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015220C071029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015220 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Although an honorable discharge (HD) or GD may be issued if warranted by the members record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015223
The applicant states, in effect, that he began his training as a cadet at the USMA at West Point on 25 June 1994, that on 17 December 1997 a professor recommended that he be investigated for cheating, that the HIH convened on 19 and 29 February 1998, and that only five out of the required six honor committee members voted that he had the intent to commit the Cadet Honor Code (CHC) violation (cheating). He states that the HIH made a procedural error because only five out of the required six...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015224C071029
The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH and MOH during the time of his service. The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded either the PH or MOH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration related to the PH, MOH and the authority and reason for his separation on 21 October 1971, the date of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015226
Based on the applicant having less than 20 years of service and a disability rating at less than 30 percent, he was, therefore, separated with entitlement to disability severance pay instead of a disability retirement consistent with law and regulation. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated. As provided for in law, the DVA has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015231
Temporary Award The commander of any Army unit which has assigned Army aircraft may authorize in published orders qualified personnel of his command to wear the Aircraft Crewman Badge. Permanent Award An individual who has performed in one of the duties specified in a above for not less than 12 months (not necessarily consecutive), or is school trained for a principal duty contained in a above, will be authorized to wear the Aircraft Crewman Badge permanently. However, evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015234
Accordingly, he was issued the proper RE Code of RE-4 for a non-waivable disqualification and he has failed to show through the evidence submitted and the evidence of record that his RE Code is incorrect. RE Code RE-3P is not a RE Code used by the Army and therefore is not applicable in his case. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION (DENY) REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.100.0300 4/re code 2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015236
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015236 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. A DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 22 March 1982, states that the punishment of reduction to E-1 suspended for 90 days, imposed on 12 June 1981, was set aside. Records show the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015238
During its original review of the applicant's request for the PH, the Board found no evidence of record to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015241
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015241 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant request, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015247
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 May 1979, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Since the applicants brief record of service included one nonjudicial punishment and 105 days of lost time, his record of service was not satisfactory.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015250C071029
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 1952; a letter of support, dated 11 April 2004; a Headquarters, 2d Infantry Division War Diary for 29 August 1950; and two documents from his medical records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 3 September 1952...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015255 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015256
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants discharge are not present in the available records (loaned to Veterans Administration Center, Togus, Maine on 28 September 1983); however, his records do contain a duly authenticated report of separation (DD Form 214) which shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 15 April 1974 under the provisions of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015259
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was wounded a second time as a result of hostile action. Item 11 (List all significant diseases, wounds, and injuries) on the applicants WD AGO Form 38 (Report of Physical Examination of Enlisted Personnel Prior to Discharge, Release from Active Duty or Retirement), dated 25 September 1945, shows he was hospitalized in England in February 1944 for trouble with right knee. This medical record also shows the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015269
These orders further show the applicant was issued a Dishonorable Discharge. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows that he was separated with a dishonorable discharge under the provisions of paragraph 3-10, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of court-martial. Evidence of record shows the applicant was 19 years old at the time of his enlistment into the Army and at the time the offenses occurred.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015272
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD). In his statement, the applicant indicated that he understood that if he remained in the military he would face a trial by court-martial for a charge of larceny, and although he may have received a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD), he felt he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015282
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015282 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and his DA Form 20.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015287
Item 38 (Record of Assignments), of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows his principal duties to be those of a cook and first cook, in MOS, 94B20, from 18 December 1965 to 4 July 1967. The evidence shows that the applicant enlisted as a 94B/Cook, that his principle duties were those of a cook, and that he served as cook from 18 December 1965 to 4 July 1967. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015290
The applicant's record shows that he is currently serving in the United States Army Reserve. Department of the Army, Headquarters, 9th Regional Readiness Command, Honolulu, Hawaii, Orders Number 03-365-00090, dated 31 December 2003, show that the applicant was ordered to active duty under the provisions of 10 U.S.C 12304 [involuntary] in support of Operation Enduring Freedom on 5 January 2004 for a period not to exceed 365 days. Category 3: Applies to Soldiers currently mobilized under the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015292C071029
On 21 May 2001, the FSM and the applicant divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. He and the applicant divorced in May 2001.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015295
The applicant states, in effect, that his orders show he was called to active duty from a home address in Massachusetts, not from the address listed on his 10 April 2001 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Therefore, it is appropriate to correct the records to show that, as of 3 June 2003, the applicant's home of record was changed to Leominster, Massachusetts. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015302
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015302 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He also states that he was unaware that physical injuries in combat without bloodshed were eligible for award of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015307
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015307 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that when he turned age 60 in 1997 he was issued a DD Form 2 (United States Uniformed Services Identification Card (Reserve Retired)) that had an expiration date of 28 February 2002 on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015308
His records were sent to the July 1993 Promotion Board for promotion to the rank of BG/O-7. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 15 September 1996, the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant alleges to have been considered and not selected for promotion to BG by the 1993 General Officer Selection Promotion Board; however, he provided no documentary evidence to support his allegation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015310C071029
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) pay record on the FSM fails to show he ever made another annuity election under either the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) or SBP subsequent to his original election to decline coverage under the COA. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015311C071029
Because there was no evidence of the applicant’s declination to participate in the SBP when he turned age 60 on 30 November 2004, he was automatically enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage. The applicant’s request to continue participation in the SBP for spouse coverage, as the government had selected for him effective the date of his retirement, is reasonable. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015312C071029
On 24 March 1980, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate; however, the separation authority may issue...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015314C071108
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015314 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 24 January 1972, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 28 January 1972, the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015315
The applicant requests removal of Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the period 1 April 1998 through 31 March 1999 [hereafter referred to as the contested report] from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Part VIIb of the contested report shows the SR's evaluation resulted in a "Below Center of Mass Retain" evaluation. Although the applicant provided a statement from the rater, this statement is not sufficient evidence to show that the contested report did not accurately reflect...