Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015287
Original file (20060015287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  3 May 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060015287 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz

Acting Director

Ms. Joyce A. Wright

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Richard T. Dunbar

Chairperson

Mr. Michael J. Flynn

Member

Mr. Rose M. Lys

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that item 23a (Specialty Number and Title), of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), be corrected to show that he was listed as a supply supervisor and KP (Kitchen Police) supervisor.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is listed as a cook on his DD Form 214 and he was in charge of supply and supervising KP’s.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his request. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice which occurred on 6 July 1967, the date of his release from active duty.  The application submitted in this case is dated 18 August 2007 (sic) but was received for processing on 1 November 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 July 1965.  The applicant successfully completed basic combat training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, and advanced individual training at Fort Knox, Kentucky.  On completion of his advanced training, he was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS), 94B, Cook.

4.  The applicant was promoted to the rank and pay grade of (SP5/E-5) on 26 December 1966.  He served until he was released from active duty on 6 July 1967.  He was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).  He continued to serve in the USAR until he was honorably discharged on 21 July 1971, in the rank of SP5, in MOS 94B20.


5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments), of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), shows his principal duties to be those of a cook and first cook, in MOS, 94B20, from 18 December 1965 to 4 July 1967.

6.  Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title), of the applicant's DD Form 214, shows the entry "94B20 Cook."  There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records to show the applicant was reclassified to a supply MOS or performed the duties of a KP supervisor.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It provided, in pertinent part, that the soldier's primary specialty number and title would be entered in item 23a, of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant enlisted as a 94B/Cook, that his principle duties were those of a cook, and that he served as cook from 18 December 1965 to 4 July 1967.  There are no orders in his service personnel records to show that he was reclassified to a supply MOS or performed the duties of a KP supervisor.  Therefore, item 23a (Primary Specialty Number and Title), of his DD Form 214, is correct as currently constituted.  

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 6 July 1967; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 5 July 1970.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.








BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_MJF____  __RML__  __RTD__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




_____Richard T. Dunbar______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060015287
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070503
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE
19670706
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR 635-200, chap 5
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015798C070206

    Original file (20050015798C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that his MOS was 12A (Pioneer) not 94B (Cook) as recorded on his DD Form 214. This Form also shows he served in MOS 94B (Cook) from 31 May 1966 through the date of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015295C070206

    Original file (20050015295C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded 94B as his PMOS and 52B was changed to his SMOS per his request. Therefore, there is no error or injustice and no basis for correction of the applicant's DD Form 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062850C070421

    Original file (2001062850C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 2 March 1972 to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (automotive maintenance) instead of 94B (cook). He also requests that his date of entry on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 28 November 1968 be corrected to show 22 March 1968 instead of 29 November 1968. Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007757

    Original file (20090007757.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he held MOS 94B when he was released from active duty. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records and the applicant provided none to show that he was reclassified to a combat arms MOS or to any other MOS while he served on active duty or while he served in Vietnam. There is no evidence he was ever awarded any other MOS, to include a combat arms MOS, after he was reclassified into MOS 94B from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078182C070215

    Original file (2002078182C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record shows there are errors on the applicant's DD Form 214 concerning his rank and grade and his MOS. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 January 1968 - 9 January 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000694C070205

    Original file (20060000694C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 22 March 1968 through 21 November 1969. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded MOS 94B and that he served in this MOS during the period 26 July 1968 through 21 November 1973. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 21 November 1973; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on 20 November 1976.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050011727

    Original file (20050011727.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the date of birth (DOB) entered in Item 9 (Date of Birth) and the military occupational specialty (MOS) entered in Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) of his 16 April 1969 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant's DOB was in fact 30 May 1946, as evidenced by entries on his DD Form 47, DA Form 20, and birth certificate. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013351

    Original file (20100013351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded an infantry MOS. Records show the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service from 28 June 1965 to 28 May 1968 for award of the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005880C070205

    Original file (20060005880C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (gunner) instead of MOS 94B (cook). There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was awarded MOS 11B. There is no evidence of record which shows he served in MOS 11B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010167

    Original file (20080010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12 (Last Duty of Assignment and Major Command) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. His record also confirms that on the date of his REFRAD, he held the PMOS of 94B, as evidenced by orders on file in his MPRJ and an entry on his DA Form 20, and that this PMOS is properly listed in Item 23a of his...