Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015112
Original file (20060015112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060015112 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


x
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to be awarded the Purple Heart and to be awarded the Meritorious Unit Citation (MUC) and Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) if he is so entitled.

2.  The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam on 25 September 1967 and was treated for his wounds at the 12th Evacuation Hospital.  He was released to his unit on the same day and the treatment was made a matter of record.  He further states that he did not receive the Purple Heart, at the time awards were the last thing on his mind.  He continues by stating that he has been made aware that his unit was awarded the MUC and PUC and desires that they be added to his records.

3.  The applicant provides photo copies of Standard Forms (SF’s) 600 (Chronological Records of Medical Care) from his military medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20050005868, on 12 January 2006.

2.  The SF’s 600 provided by the applicant indicate that on 25 September 1967 an entry was made in his records indicating that he sustained first degree burns over his face and arms with one three-centimeter diameter area of second degree burn on the left arm.  “Denies inhalation.”  

3.  The applicant continued to receive follow-up treatment for his burns until 28 October 1967.  The medical records provided by the applicant do not indicate if the burns were the result of hostile action by the enemy.  

4.  A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) fails to show that the applicant’s unit earned the MUC and PUC during the period he served with the unit.    

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
   
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant has provided evidence to show that he was treated for burns received while in Vietnam, there is no indication of the circumstances surrounding that injury.    

2.  The Board acknowledged in it’s previous decision that there was evidence that he had been treated for burns while in Vietnam and concluded that there was no evidence to show that the burns were the resultant cause of enemy action.  Again, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted and the evidence of record that his injuries were caused by enemy action.  Therefore, lacking such evidence there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.   

3.  Likewise, the Board found no evidence to show that his unit was awarded the MUC and PUC during the period he was assigned to the unit.  Accordingly, he is not entitled to have those awards added to his records.  

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5.  In arriving at its decision, the Board wants the applicant to know that the decision of the Board in this case in no way diminishes the quality of his service to our Army and our Nation.  The applicant’s dedicated service and his performance in the Army of the United States to meet the needs of the Service demonstrated the finest traditions of the American Soldier and should be a source of pride to the applicant.    

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x__  __x  ___  ___x_  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20050005868, dated 18 January 2006.




______ x_______
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR20060015112
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
20070501
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1. 107.0015
61/PH
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000848

    Original file (20100000848.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action or as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle," that he was treated by medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009689

    Original file (20110009689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 6 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110009689 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The following areas were reviewed in an attempt to validate award of the Purple Heart: * there are no orders awarding the Purple Heart in the applicant's military personnel file * review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073599C070403

    Original file (2002073599C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was initially assigned to the A Battery, 6 th Battalion, 29 th Artillery , 4 th Infantry Division as a cannoneer. Although the applicable regulation provides that the CIB is only awarded to personnel who possess an infantry military occupational specialty who are assigned to an infantry unit that engages in ground combat against an enemy; there were exceptions made through a published supplement which clearly indicates that radio operators who served as advisors in infantry or infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077114C070215

    Original file (2002077114C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Soldier’s Medal is awarded to any person of the Armed Forces of the United States or of a friendly foreign nation who, while serving in any capacity with the Army of the United states, distinguished himself or herself by heroism not involving actual conflict with the enemy. The evidence of record fails to show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicant was recommended for an award of the Soldier’s Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080933C070215

    Original file (2002080933C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that his commander recommended him for the Silver Star and he should have also received the Purple Heart for his wounds. Army Regulation 15-185, the regulation under which this Board operates, states that the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available to them. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001098

    Original file (20120001098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal. The entries in item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 and the Vietnam casualty roster which show he was wounded on 11 August 1968 and on 12 April 1969 in Vietnam are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to add two awards of the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019045

    Original file (20100019045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect: * two awards of the Purple Heart * two awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * one award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * the addition of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Parachutist Badge * the addition of the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * a change of his rank to sergeant (SGT) as reflected on his Purple Heart Citation, dated 3 June 1968 2. The applicant provides copies...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009436

    Original file (20130009436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show all of his authorized awards to include the Purple Heart, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, weapons qualification badges, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart has been noted and appears to lack merit because he has failed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001315

    Original file (20080001315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Although there are no orders in the available record showing that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart, there is sufficient evidence to establish that he was wounded in action against the enemy on 27 February 1968 and that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005231

    Original file (20090005231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is authorized for honorable active service for any period between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. Therefore, it would be appropriate to accept the date provided by the applicant as the most accurate date, and to award him the PH for wounds received as a result of hostile action in the RVN in June 1967; and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result,...