RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 July 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015310
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Kathleen A. Newman | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Susan A. Powers | |Member |
| |Mr. Edward E. Montgomery | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that she be provided a Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
2. The applicant states, in effect, she is entitled to a SBP annuity based
on the death of her husband, a former service member (FSM).
3. The applicant provides the FSM's Death Certificate in support of the
application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. On 30 June 1961, the FSM retired, in the rank and pay grade of
First Sergeant/E-8 (1SG/E-8), after completing 20 years, 2 months, and 24
days of active military service.
2. The record contains an Election of Options Under the Uniformed Services
Contingency Option Act (COA) of 1953 (DA Form 1041), dated 25 November
1957, which the FSM completed during his retirement processing. In Item 11
of this document, the FSM indicated that he did not desire to receive
reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependents. He
authenticated this election document with his signature in Item 15
(Signature of Applicant).
3. A review of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) pay
record on the FSM fails to show he ever made another annuity election under
either the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP) or SBP
subsequent to his original election to decline coverage under the COA.
4. The Uniformed Services Contingency Option Act of 1953 (COA) provided
that a military member could elect to receive a reduced amount of retired
pay in order to insure that his survivors (widow and/or children) would
receive a portion of his retired pay upon his death in a retired status.
5. Public Law 381, 87th Congress, enacted 4 October 1961, amended the COA
by changing its name to Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan
(RSFPP). It also made major changes concerning entitlement both to
annuities and to Dependency and Indemnity Compensation payments to families
of physical disability retirees.
6. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the RSFPP and
established the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The SBP provided that
military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay
reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. It
declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to
enactment of the law. Public Law 93-155, enacted 16 November 1973,
extended that Open Season from 12 to
18 months (21 September 1972-20 March 1974).
7. Public Law 97-35, enacted 12 August 1981, established an Open Season
from 1 October 1981-30 September 1982. Public 101-189, enacted
29 November 1989, established an Open Season from 1 October 1991-
30 September 1992. Public Law 101-510, enacted 5 November 1990, changed
the Open Season period enacted in Public Law 97-35 to 1 April 1992-31 March
1993. Public 108-375, enacted 28 October 2004, established an Open Season
from 1 October 2005-30 September 2006. All of these Open Seasons were
extensively publicized in Army Echoes to ensure all retirees were informed
of their existence.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's claim of entitlement to a SBP annuity based on the
death of her husband was carefully considered. However, the evidence of
record confirms the FSM declined coverage under the COA during his initial
retirement processing, and there is no indication that he ever elected to
subsequently participate in either the RSFPP or SBP.
2. Absent any evidence that the FSM enrolled in the COA, RSFPP, or SBP
between the date of his retirement and the date of his death, there is an
insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___KAN _ __SAP __ __EEM __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_____Kathleen A. Newman____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20060015310 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2007/07/10 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |1961/06/30 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |10 USC 3914 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |Retirement |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Ms. Mitrano |
|ISSUES 1. |137.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015824C071029
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows that the FSM enrolled in the RSFPP in conjunction with his retirement on 30 June 1967, and that premiums continued to be collected from his retired pay through the date of his death in 1995, more than 18 years after his first spouse died in 1977. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017621
There is no evidence in the FSM's military records and the applicant provides no evidence which shows the FSM participated in the SBP or the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan (RSFPP). The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. Since there is no evidence of record which shows the FSM made an SBP election prior to his death, and the evidence of record shows he had opportunities...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013792
Army Echoes also warned that for a retiree with a high number of years since first being able to enroll a beneficiary in the SBP and whose retired pay was fairly high, the enrollment premium alone could exceed $50,000. The available evidence shows that the FSM was eligible to enroll in the SBP for spouse coverage when it was established in 1972 or during any one of several subsequent Open Seasons. Even if the FSM had attempted to enroll in the SBP during the 1 October 2005 through 30...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020598
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests his military records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) prior to retirement. There is no evidence of record which shows the FSM elected SBP prior to his retirement. Although the FSM retired in 1968, there is no evidence to show he enrolled in the SBP when it was established in 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102540C070208
The applicant requests that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Extensive publicity of this Open Season was given in Army Echoes, the Army bulletin published and mailed to retirees to keep them abreast of their rights and privileges and to inform them of developments in the Army. The FSM retired on 1 May 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077690C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). An election to provide an annuity of one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth of the member's retired pay had to be made before the end of the 18th year of service. Records at DFAS-CL show that he failed to enroll in the SBP when it was established in 1972 and there is no evidence to show he attempted to enroll during a subsequent Open...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005547
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110005547 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she married the FSM after he retired from the service. There is no indication the FSM elected to participate in the USCOA, the RSFPP, or the SBP, either at the time of or immediately following his retirement or during any of the later open enrollment seasons.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058364C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than maximum spouse coverage. He then failed to enroll in the SBP when it was established in 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028925
The applicant states the FSM did not keep up with his retired service member benefits. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018686 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100028925 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005999
The FSM's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 November 1952. His service record does not show that he made an SBP election. The FSM served in the Regular Army from 28 November 1952 to 31 January 1955.