ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010310
The 16 August 2005 memorandum indicates the applicant was selected for promotion to MAJ by a SSB under the 2004 criteria with an effective date of 21 March 2005. Notwithstanding the National Guard Bureau recommendation that the applicant's DOR be adjusted from 23 August 2005 to 15 March 2005 based on Orders 081-054, dated 22 March 2005, it would be equitable to adjust the applicant's DOR to MAJ from 25 August 2005 to 2 June 2004 based on the information received from the COARNG that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010312
Additional credit may be granted in unusual cases based on special education or professional experience in the specialty in which assigned when experience is accrued after qualifying degree and licensure, if applicable (Army Nurse officers are granted one-half for each year of education or experience up to a maximum of 3 years credit). However, as stated in the advisory opinion, the letter the applicant provided from Interim Healthcare, Incorporated documenting his work experience could not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010314
The Member of Congress essentially states that the applicant has submitted new evidence that addresses his request for the Presidential Unit Citation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Presidential Unit Citation (known as the Distinguished Unit Citation until 3 November 1966) is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the applicant is entitled to award of the Presidential Unit Citation, and correction of his military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010315C071113
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) of his separation document (DD Form 214). On 1 November 1991, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for an early separation. There is no evidence in his military record that shows that he was absent more than 6 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010316
The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or an honorable discharge. On 12 September 1968, while attending advanced individual training, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for going absent without leave (AWOL) on 18 August 1968 and remaining AWOL until his return on 2 September 1968. In an undated disposition form, the applicant, subsequent to receiving legal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010317
The applicant essentially states that he was wounded by mortar fire while engaging the enemy on or about 28 February 1952 during the Korean War. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Republic of Korea Korean War Service Medal, and correction of his military records to show this award. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by issuing an appropriate document to show award of the National Defense Service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010319C071113
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant’s contentions that his discharge should be upgraded because he was young and immature were carefully considered and found to be insufficient evidence in supporting his request. After carefully evaluating the evidence of record in this case, it is determined that the applicant’s discharge processing was conducted in accordance...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010324
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 3 November 2000, the applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure with an honorable discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 4 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010326
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and any other medals or citations that he is entitled to be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty). The applicant served 3 years of continuous enlisted active duty service from 24 May 2001 to 23 May 2004; however, his DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for this period of service. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010329
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010329 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010334
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for hearing loss be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant has not stated, and there is no evidence which shows, that his VA rated disability is combat related for CRSC purposes.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010335C070205
Qawly Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that Orders 209-3195 dated 28 July 2005, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Center advised her to submit a request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for removal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010342
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010342 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010343 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. A copy of award orders are not available in the applicant's service records; however, Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns), of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, Part II), dated 14 July 1986,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010350C071029
In regard to the OER for the period ending 29 October 2002, the applicant states his rater and SR were aware of the IG report during this rating period. On 17 March 2003, the applicant appealed the two contested OERs with the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM). However, it appears it was done for his benefit, pending the conclusion of the 99th RSC IG investigation concerning allegations he made against his chain of command.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010354
The applicant provides the following in support of this application: a. a letter, dated 25 April 2006, from a Soldier claiming to have served with the applicant in the 34th Military Police Detachment; b. an undated letter from a Soldier claiming to be from the 34th Military Police Detachment; c. a letter of appreciation, dated 27 July 2001; d. a letter, dated 3 April 2003, from a colonel recommending favorable consideration for the readmission of the applicant into the United States Army; e....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010358
The applicants DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Iraq Campaign Medal, correction of his military records to show the award of the Iraq Campaign Medal, and correction of his military records to remove any references to him being awarded the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal for his service in Iraq from 28 April 2003 to 25 July 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010380
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) which was issued at the time of his release from active duty on 15 November 2003 be corrected to show the award of the Bronze Star Medal with V (for Valor) Device, the Iraq Campaign Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, the Southwest Asia Service Medal with Three Bronze Service Stars, the Kuwait Liberation Medal issued by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Kuwait...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010389
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. The applicant also understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Discharge Certificate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010394
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides his WD AGO Form 53, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge, his CRSC approval dated 8 July 2006, and his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rating decision. The applicants records do not show that he was wounded.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010395
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 17 October 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 16 October 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010398
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He stated that due to family problems, he neglected to request an extension of his shipment entitlement of his household goods. It would be equitable to correct his records to show he requested, and received, an extension of his shipment entitlement of his household goods on 1 September 2005 and 1 September 2006.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010407C071029
Donald L. Lewy | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states he was discharged with an honorable discharge his first enlistment. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010408
On 27 October 1988, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, for a pattern of misconduct and that he be issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010412C071029
It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. General orders awarding the applicant the Air Medal (2d and 3d award) are not available. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010415
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he requested any kind of assistance from his chain of command, and there is no record of any family issues in his military records. Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel) provides, in pertinent part, that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010417
The applicant requests, in effect, that his dates of service be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and that his unspecified leave of absence be included in these dates. On 24 January 1983, the discharge authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 for failure to meet medical procurement standards. Therefore, there is no basis for correcting his service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010420C071113
The Purple Heart was not included in the list of authorized awards contained on the applicant’s DD Form 214. This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 15 March 1967 in the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010425C070205
Paragraph 3-37b (2) states, in pertinent part, that for Soldiers, in the rank of sergeant and above, the original of the DA Form 2627 will be sent to the appropriate custodian for filing in the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, that application for removal of an Article 15 from a Soldier's OMPF based on error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant states that the Article 15 was based on an unjust investigation; however, she...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010432
The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her husbands records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds he received during action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010436
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010439C071029
The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to fully honorable. The applicant was discharged on 4 November 1976 with a general under honorable conditions discharge under the EDP, while he was still 17 years of age. It is recognized that the regulation provided for the applicant to receive either a general under honorable conditions discharge or a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010440
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 27 February 1968, the date of his discharge from the Regular Army. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 27 February 1968; therefore, the time for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010446
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicants service record shows he received two special courts-martial for being AWOL on two separate occasions for over 200 days in addition to the AWOL which led to his separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010447
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 October 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010447 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. The applicant's entire record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010464
He further requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be reissued with his correct awards, to include the BSM. The BSM orders and certificate are sufficient evidence to correct the applicants records to show this award. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued one DD Form 215.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010470C071029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010470 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded. On 8 July 1998, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010472
His DD Form 214 for the period ending 27 November 2003 shows the Army Commendation Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with M Device, the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Bar, and the Army Lapel Button as authorized awards. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. The applicant was ordered to active duty on 2 January 2003 and was separated on 27 November 2003.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 2006001049C070205
By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was the result of enemy action, that it was treated by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH, for being wounded in action in the RVN on 7 January 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010500C071029
Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the reentry code...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010504
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general or honorable discharge. On 23 August 2000, the applicant was discharged 24 June 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 in lieu of trial by court-martial with a UOTHC discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010510
Evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action against the enemy on 5 April 1968. The applicant participated in four campaigns during his two tours in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010512C071113
Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The application submitted in this case is dated 17 July 2006. Therefore, on 21 September 1982, the United States Army Court of Military Review approved only so much of the sentence providing for a Bad Conduct Discharge, confinement for one year, and total forfeiture of pay and allowances.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010522C071029
James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In November 1977, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. The applicant’s record of service does not warrant granting the relief requested and there is insufficient evidence that would warrant upgrading it as a matter of clemency.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010523C071029
On 7 January 2001, the applicant was honorably discharged, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. He was given a separation program designator (SPD) code of JPD (separation for alcohol rehabilitation failure under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9) and an RE code of 4. Therefore, there is insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010525
Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on the applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded the Parachutist Badge by Headquarters, Training Support Battalion, Fort Benning, Georgia, Special Order Number 31, dated 4 February 1970. Therefore, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal should be added to his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010527C071029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010527 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 30 July 1973, action was initiated to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 for unfitness. On 26 October 1973, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, with a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010530
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge on 16 April 1979. As a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error injustice to this Board expired on 15 April 1982.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010537
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010537 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. She was involuntarily discharged for misconduct and issued a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010543C071029
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 29 January 1993 omitted his Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Single Channel Radio Operator Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course (BNCOC). Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 29 January 1993; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired...