Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010315C071113
Original file (20060010315C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        3 April 2007
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060010315


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz            |     |Acting Director      |
|     |Ms. Judy L. Blanchard             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Infante                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Susan A. Powers               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 29 (Dates of Time
Lost During This Period) of his separation document (DD Form 214).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 reflects time
lost as
1 year and 6 days, instead of 6 days.  He adds that this single entry
precludes reenlistment.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his
application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 1 December 1991.  The application submitted in this case
is dated
18 July 2006.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular
Army and entered active duty on 5 October 1988.  He was trained in, awarded
and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63S (Heavy Wheel
Vehicle Mechanic).  The highest grade he attained was pay grade E-4.

4.  The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows, in
Section III, Item 21 (Time Lost), that the applicant was absent without
leave (AWOL) from 3 to 9 March 1989.  The DA Form 2-1 Section VII Item 35
also shows that the applicant was AWOL from 3 to 9 March 1989.  There is no
other AWOL time listed in his military record.  The applicant’s military
record shows continuous military service.

5.  On 31 October 1991, the applicant requested early separation under the
provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 (Enlisted Voluntary
Early Transition Program).  He acknowledged that he understood that if the
request was approved he would not be able to withdraw his request except in
cases of unforeseen personal hardship.

6.  On 1 November 1991, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s
request for an early separation.

7.  On 1 December 1991, the applicant was honorably release from active
duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Paragraph 16-8
(Convenience of The Government: FY 92 Early Transition Program).  The
applicant’s DD Form 214, shows he completed a total of 3 years, 1 month and
20 days of active military service and accrued 368 days of time lost.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) provides the basic
authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 16-8 of this
regulation sets forth the requirements for early separation of enlisted
personnel due to reduction in force, strength limitations, or budgetary
constraints.  The service of personnel separated under this paragraph will
be characterized as honorable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the date of entry contained in Item 29
of his DD Form 214 incorrectly reads (890303 - 900309) and should in fact
read
(890303 - 890309) was carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  The applicant military record confirms 6 days of AWOL time from 3 to 9
March 1989.  There is no evidence in his military record that shows that he
was absent more than 6 days.

3.  Therefore, in view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate
to amend Item 29 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 by deleting the current
entry (890303 - 900309) and replacing it with the entry (890303 - 890309).


4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 1 December 1991; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on 30 November 1994.  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available
evidence, it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

___JI ___  ___SAP_  __QAS __  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

      The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records
of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting current entry in item
29 (dates of time lost during this period) (890303-900309) and replace it
with the entry (890303-890309).




                            ______John Infante______
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR                                      |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |2007/04/03                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schwartz                            |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011461

    Original file (20060011461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 21 June 1991. However, subsequent documents filed in the applicant's military service records (i.e., the DA Form 1811 and Orders 156-019, dated 5 June 1991) indicate that the applicant's grade was PFC (E-3). The evidence of record shows that the DD Form 2A (Reserve) ID Card was issued to the applicant on 23 May 1991, which was prior to 5 June 1991; the date when the applicant's military service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005036

    Original file (20130005036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show in item 12a. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he entered active duty on 22 March 1989 and that the Narrative Reason for Separation was “Misconduct – Pattern of Misconduct.” 9. The evidence of record clearly shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 22 March 1989.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001053925

    Original file (2001053925.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 May 1989, the applicant was discharged. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010877C071029

    Original file (20060010877C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows the applicant received a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment in July 1991 for refusing to attend PLDC. It appears she may have been offered early separation as part of a troop reduction program; however, her voluntary separation was processed under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b because she did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010613

    Original file (20060010613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) be corrected to show that he had sufficient service to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) benefits. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001426C070208

    Original file (20040001426C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he completed 24 months of creditable active service and 4 years of Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) service. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 1-36(e) also states that, when a soldier has a remaining Reserve obligation upon discharge under chapter 16-5, discharge must be made "only when the circumstances of the individual case clearly indicate that the soldier has no potential for useful service under conditions of full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014808

    Original file (20110014808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a separate DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) showing her honorable service before she reenlisted. Her DD Form 214 shows she completed 3 years, 5 months, and 17 days of net active service. This period of honorable service is correctly recorded in item 18 of her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000042884

    Original file (2000042884.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the Board found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:GERARD W. SCHWARTZ Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015090C071029

    Original file (20060015090C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 June 1991, the applicant was discharged with a discharge UOTHC, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 17 June 1991; therefore, the time for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010212

    Original file (20140010212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following: * an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable or a general discharge * amendment of the following items of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 25 (Separation Authority) * Item 26 (Separation Code) * Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) * Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) 2. In his request for discharge, he indicated/acknowledged: * he was making the...