ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068399C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. However, the PH is not included in the list of earned authorized awards contained in Item 33 and Item 34 (Wounds Received In Action) contains the entry “None”, which indicates that the applicant was not wounded in action during his active duty tenure. The evidence of record gives no indication that the applicant was wounded in action during his active duty tenure.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068416C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The MSE conducted on 2 March 1970, found the applicant to have an emotionally unstable personality. The applicant has not presented and the records do not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068418C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 2 September 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board determined the applicant’s discharge had been proper and equitable and it denied his request for an upgrade. A discharge UOTHC is normally considered appropriate for members separating under these provisions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068420C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068421C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Information available to the Board indicates that the applicant’s original petition to the Board was denied on 12 February 1975. A 17 January 1973 clinical record prepared at Kimbrough Army Hospital at Fort Meade, Maryland, shows that the applicant was admitted to the hospital on 17 December 1972 and discharged from that hospital on 20 December 1972.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068422C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068423C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068424C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068426C070402
After carefully reviewing the application, military records and all other evidence, the Army Discharge Review Board determined that he had been properly and equitably discharged; accordingly, his request for a change in the character and/or reason for discharge was denied. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The evidence of record clearly indicates that it was the applicant who requested that he be separated from the US Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068428C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068429C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068430C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068431C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068432C070402
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records, which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart or the CIB. Army Regulation 600-200, Enlisted Personnel Management System, the regulation then in effect, provides that item 40 (Wounds) of the Enlisted Qualification Record, will contain a brief description of wounds or injuries requiring medical treatment, received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization. The evidence of record shows that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068433C070402
The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in the Army of the United States on 15 February 1966. Although the applicant did not meet all requirements for the PH, the Board believes that he has presented enough evidence to grant him entitlement to the award of the PH. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the applicant’s DD Form 214 to show the awards of the Purple Heart, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068434C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068435C070402
He again went AWOL on 6 July 1968 and remained absent until he contacted military authorities on 3 October 1974, requesting that he be allowed to participate in the program established under Presidential Proclamation 4313. On 20 January 1975, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Presidential Proclamation 4313, dated 16 September 1974. The Clemency Discharge is a neutral discharge, issued neither under “honorable conditions”...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068437C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068439C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068441C070402
On 6 March 1975, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant of being AWOL from 8 October 1974 to 28 February 1975. On 28 April 1975, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a UD. On 22 June 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068442C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068443C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068445C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068446C070402
There is no indication in the applicant’s service records which shows that the unit to which he was assigned during his active duty service was cited for award of a unit citation. The applicant did not serve a period of active duty which qualified him for award of the Army Service Ribbon; therefore there is no basis for award of the Army Service Ribbon to the applicant. The applicant did not serve a period of active duty which qualified him for award of the Overseas Service Ribbon;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068447C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: The retirement grade of major shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). The retirement orders submitted by the applicant supporting his contention that he was promoted to the grade of major, dated 2 May 1978, show his highest grade held on active duty was captain, not major.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068448C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068449C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068451C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068453C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068456C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068458C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068459C070402
The applicant’s military records show he enlisted on 27 February 1970. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was authorized to perform TDY for 23 days in Korea while serving in Okinawa. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 to show his 23 days of TDY in Korea.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068460C070402
Chapter 26 contains the policy for the payment of BAH and it states, in pertinent part, that RC personnel ordered to active duty for periods of 139 days or less are entitled to BAH-II and those ordered to active duty for a period of 140 days or more are authorized BAH-I. The evidence of record confirms that, while the active duty orders provided to the applicant were not technically incorrect, they did not comply with the intent of the JTF Olympics document planners. That all of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068461C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 25 September 1962, the confinement at hard labor portion of the sentence was suspended for 30 days.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068462C070402
His DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) lists his authorized awards as the National Defense Service Medal, the [RVN] Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068463C070402
The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army for four years on 24 February 1994. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal and the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068464C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Report of Separation, DD Form 214, be amended to show his correct date of birth. The Board is authorized to correct any military record to correct an error.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068466C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he began using heroin while in the military and "was immediately addicted to this drug." On 30 January 2002 the Army Discharge Review Board unanimously denied the applicant's petition to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068467C070402
On 11 February 2002, the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB) evaluated the applicant’s record to determine if he should be advanced to the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 on the Retired List. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was reduced to SSG/E-6 due to his own misconduct as a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068472C070402
After review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), the QMP Board barred the applicant from further reenlistment in the USAR AGR program. Records show that a Department of the Army QMP Board considered the applicant's OMPF and determined that he should be barred from further reenlistment in the USAR AGR program. Therefore, the Board determined that the applicant's records along with his appeal should be reconsidered by the AR-PERSCOM QMP Appeals Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068477C070402
The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be changed to show his correct social security number (SSN). It was also the identification number entered in the service record that was created on him upon his entry on active duty, and in all the orders and documents published throughout his tenure on active duty that are filed in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ). The evidence of records confirms that the applicant’s current verified SSN is consistent with the one...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068479C070402
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 19 July 2000, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068481C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant, who had no prior military service, enlisted in the USAR on 12 September 1998. However, his DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing-Armed Forces of the United States) notes the term of his enlistment was 8 years.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068483C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records are not available. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068485C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) . There is no available evidence of record that the applicant served in combat as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068487C070402
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect all of the "medals" he received during his Vietnam service. By virtue of the applicant's service in Vietnam he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, denoting participation in two designated campaign period, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and three awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm (based on his assignment with the 2 nd Squadron,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068492C070402
Item 28 (Chronological Record of Military Service) on the applicant’s WD AGO Form 66 (Officer’s, Warrant Officer’s, and Flight Officer’s Qualification Record) shows that as a member of the Korean Military Advisory Group he served as an advisor in MOS 1331 (Combat Engineer Unit Commander) to 107th Engineer Combat Battalion of the Republic of Korea Army from 18 May 1951 through 26 April 1952. Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068494C070402
His WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) shows as authorized awards the Combat Infantryman Badge, the World War II Victory Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, the Philippine Liberation Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Meritorious Unit Emblem. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068496C070402
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Superior Unit Award. The attached listing of staff agencies and supporting organizations to this memorandum shows that, at the time of the applicant’s assignment to the 306th Military Intelligence Battalion, the unit was cited for award of the Army Superior Unit Award based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 29, dated 31 December 2001. That all...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068497C070402
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged in the rank of private first class (PFC). The applicant states that he was discharged in the rank of private/E-2 but had been promoted to the rank of PFC on 26 July 1954. RECOMMENDATION : That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was REFRAD on 20 January 1955, in the temporary rank and pay grade of PFC E-3 (T), with an...