| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Ted S. Kanamine | Member | |
| Ms. Lana E. McGlynn | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect all of the "medals" he received during his Vietnam service. He states that his separation document does not reflect all of his awards, and specifically notes the absence of the Good Conduct Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Ribbon, and Vietnam Gallantry Cross.
3. Records available to the Board indicate he entered active duty on 1 April 1969. He successfully completed training and was assigned to Fort Carson, Colorado. While assigned to Fort Carson, the applicant was punished under Article 15 of the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) for failing to report for bay guard duty at 0400 hours on 1 May 1970. His sole punishment was a forfeiture of $30.00 for one month. Notwithstanding the applicant's UCMJ action, he received excellent conduct and efficiency rating upon his departure from Fort Carson.
4. In August 1970 the applicant was reassigned to Vietnam. He was initially assigned to the 2nd Squadron of the 1st Cavalry and in September 1970 was transferred to the 5th Battalion, 22nd Artillery. He performed duties as a track vehicle mechanic with both units. In November 1970 the applicant was reassigned to the 528th Quartermaster Company where he performed duties as a wheeled vehicle mechanic. While in Vietnam the applicant participated in two designated campaign periods (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII and Consolidation I).
5. The applicant returned to the United States in November 1971 and was released from active duty on 7 November 1971 with an honorable characterization of service in pay grade E-5. The applicant's conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service were excellent.
6. The applicant's separation document reflects entitlement to the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal and a Marksmanship Qualification Badge.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the
termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. While any record of nonjudicial punishment could be in conflict with recognizing the soldier's service as exemplary, such record should not be viewed as automatically disqualifying. The nature of the infraction, the circumstances under which it occurred and when may be considered.
8. By virtue of the applicant's service in Vietnam he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, denoting participation in two designated campaign period, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and three awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm (based on his assignment with the 2nd Squadron, 1st Cavalry 7008-7009, 5th Battalion, 22nd Artillery 7009-7011, and 528th Quartermaster Company 7011-7111).
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 7 November 1971. Although he did receive one UCMJ action during this period, the Board contends that the infraction was minor and therefore should not serve as a basis to disqualify him from the award. The Board notes that all of his conduct and efficiency ratings were excellent. As such the Board concludes that it would be appropriate, and in the interest of justice, to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 April 1969 through 7 November 1971.
2. The Board also notes that by virtue of his service in Vietnam the applicant is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and three awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. His records should be corrected accordingly.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:
a. by awarding the individual concerned the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 April 1969 through 7 November 1971; and
b. by showing that he is entitled to two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and three awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm.
BOARD VOTE:
___FNE _ __TSK __ __LEM __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
____Fred N. Eichorn______
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002068487 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020813 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007232
The evidence of record shows that the applicant served his second tour in Vietnam from 17 (not 19) November 1970 through on or about 11 July 1971. His DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 15 Apr 70-11 Jul 71. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he also served in Vietnam from 17 November 1970 11 July 1971. 8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010139
The available evidence shows that two general orders were published awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service during an overlapping period. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show only one award of the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015166
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The applicant's military records are not available for review. His DD Form 214 does not list the dates of his Vietnam service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019800
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 May 1969 to 25 May 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011976
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001334
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960" Device which is not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007434
The applicant requests that the following correction be made to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) to show he was a sergeant (SGT) * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) * his overseas service bars to reflect "eight" instead of "four" 2. He departed the United States...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000561
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 March 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090000561 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with the period ending on 23 March 1971 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085075C070212
However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal. General Order Number 8541, dated 30 July 1970, filed in the applicant's service record shows the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for heroism. That the applicant's DD Form 214 be amended to show that he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal , the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011441
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of two Air Medals (AM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from the...