Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068496C070402
Original file (2002068496C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 30 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068496


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Beverly A. Young Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Hubert O. Fry Member
Mr. Thomas E. O'Shaughnessy Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Superior Unit Award.

3. The applicant states that the Army Superior Unit Award was not added to item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on her discharge document. In support of her application, she submits a copy of her DD Form 214 and a memorandum announcing award of the Army Superior Unit Award for the period 1 October 1999 to 1 October 2000.

4. The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 September 1999. She successfully completed training as a wire systems installer and was assigned to the 306th Military Intelligence Battalion in Fort Huachuca, Arizona. The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 13 October 2001 in the rank of private first class.

5. The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Army Superior Unit Award as an authorized award.

6. The applicant provided a memorandum, dated 16 January 2001, which announced approval of the Army Superior Unit Award for the period 1 October 1999 to 1 October 2000. The attached listing of staff agencies and supporting organizations to this memorandum shows that, at the time of the applicant’s assignment to the 306th Military Intelligence Battalion, the unit was cited for award of the Army Superior Unit Award based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 29, dated 31 December 2001.

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Superior Unit Award was created in 1985 to recognize outstanding meritorious performance by a unit in completing a difficult and challenging mission under extraordinary circumstances during peacetime. Circumstances may be deemed to be extraordinary when they do not represent the typical day-to-day circumstances under which the unit normally performs, or may reasonably be expected to perform, its peacetime mission.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. While the applicant was assigned to the 306th Military Intelligence Battalion, the unit was cited for award of the Army Superior Unit Award. Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Superior Unit Award.

2. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Army Superior Unit Award.

BOARD VOTE:

AAO____ HOF____ TEO_____ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  Arthur A. Omartian____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068496
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020430
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Schneider
ISSUES 1. 107.0035
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060753C070421

    Original file (2001060753C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 4 October 1999 shows in item 25 (Separation Authority) that he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13. On 9 May 2001, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) to change the reason and separation authority of his discharge to Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-18. Therefore, the applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct as currently constituted and there is no basis for correcting his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002332C070206

    Original file (20050002332C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show the Army Superior Unit Citation (correctly known as the Army Superior Unit Award). There are no orders in the applicant’s available military records nor did the applicant provide any evidence that her unit received or was entitled to the Army Superior Unit Award. Additionally, according to the Internet website, the 56th Field Artillery Command received this award in 1987, after the applicant was discharged and there is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064639C070421

    Original file (2001064639C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his second award of the ASUA was authorized retroactively after his retirement. The applicant’s retirement DD Form 214 shows one award of the ASUA as an authorized award. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the ASUA on 16 January 2001.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009915

    Original file (20100009915.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was assigned to the 29th Military Intelligence Battalion during the period for which it was awarded the ASUA. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077491C070215

    Original file (2002077491C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also requests that the Armed Forces Service Medal, for participation in NATO operations related to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), and the Army Superior Unit Award be awarded to him and added to his DD Form 214. The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the NATO Medal, Kosovo Campaign Medal, the Armed Forces Service Medal, or the Army Superior Unit Award, as authorized awards. Evidence of record shows the applicant met the criteria for award of the NATO Medal, he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091563C070212

    Original file (2003091563C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Army on 29 November 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that marksmanship badges are awarded to indicate the degree in which an individual has qualified in prescribed weapons firing courses or events.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000845

    Original file (20110000845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was deployed in support of operations in Somalia from 8 January through 10 May 1993 and Saudi Arabia from 29 February through 21 July 1996. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly. There is no available evidence showing the applicant serviced a qualifying period in a unit awarded the Army Superior Service Award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024582

    Original file (20110024582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the AAM while assigned to the 147th Maintenance Company (Forward) as a member of Task Force 6-52 ADA from 8 January 1996 to 28 February 1996. His award of the AAM verifies he was assigned to the 6th Battalion, 52nd ADA, for more than 30 days during the period the unit was cited for the ASUA. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Superior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024282

    Original file (20110024282.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 1979 to show all of his active service time * Correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1979 to show the Army Superior Unit Award * The Army Superior Unit Award be issued to him 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was assigned to the U.S. Army SBCCOM during the period this unit was cited for award of the Army Superior Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000677

    Original file (20100000677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 2005 to show award of the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM) (2nd Award) and the Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA). Permanent Orders 112-1 and Military Personnel Awards Order Number 2005-107 show that the applicant was awarded two awards of the DMSM. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was assigned to this command during the period 28...