Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068485C070402
Original file (2002068485C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 16 July 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068485

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) .

APPLICANT STATES: That he served with the 1st Cavalry Division in Kuwait in 1997 and in Bosnia in 1999.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted and entered active duty on 31 July 1996. Following one site unit training he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C10, indirect fire infantryman. In November 1997 he joined Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division.

He was separated with an honorable discharge on 1 March 2001. According to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of release or Discharge from Active Duty) his awards include the Army Achievement medal, the Good Conduct Medal, The Armed Forces Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Army Service Ribbon, the Aircraft Crewmember Badge, the Driver and Mechanic Badge, the NATO Medal (Yugoslavia) and the Army Lapel Badge.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 prescribes Army policy and procedures concerning awards. Paragraph 8-6 provides for award of the CIB. That paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB. The soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted soldier must have an infantry or special forces specialty, satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger or special forces unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat. Eligibility for special forces personnel (less the special forces medical sergeant) accrues from 20 December 1989. Retroactive awards for special forces personnel are not authorized. A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces primary duty, in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. There is no available evidence of record that the applicant served in combat as a member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. As such, he is not eligible for award of the CIB.


2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__FNE __ ___MHM_ __DPH__ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068485
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020716
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017540

    Original file (20070017540.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, counsel presents the following arguments: a. the Board erred in denying the applicant his CMB based on a determination that he was not assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that was organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regiment, or smaller size and that the word “or” is a mutually exclusive criterion that does not require the unit of attachment or assignment to be organic to an infantry unit; b. the medical officer’s statement and evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003707C070205

    Original file (20060003707C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant was awarded the CIB or CMB, nor is there any evidence to show he was assigned or attached to an infantry unit or that he performed medical duties while his MLRS artillery battery was engaged in active ground combat. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017302

    Original file (20120017302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). However, there is no evidence which shows he was assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit was engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat in the Southwest Asia (Gulf War). Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015714

    Original file (20090015714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is void of any documents showing he served as a combat medic with a qualifying infantry unit or that he was recommended for or awarded the CMB or CIB by proper authority while serving in SWA. The applicant's contention he qualified for the CMB and CIB based on his combat service in SWA in support of Operation Desert Storm has been carefully considered. The evidence of record shows the applicant held a medical MOS and not an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007265

    Original file (20080007265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam from 2 September 1967 to 17 July 1968 and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size (Company C, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry); however, he held a vehicle mechanic MOS. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant completed another period of service in the Republic of Vietnam as an infantryman from 4 June 1970 to 18 September 1970 (when he departed on leave), and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056052C070420

    Original file (2001056052C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and must actively participate in such ground combat. In addition, although authorized subsequent to his separation, based on his service in Southwest Asia during Operation Desert Storm, the applicant is clearly entitled to both the KLM-SA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014005

    Original file (20090014005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075373C070403

    Original file (2002075373C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Kuwait Liberation Medal and the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant states that the Combat Infantryman Badge was never placed on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Based on the foregoing, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge because he did not serve in an infantry duty position during Operation Desert Storm.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007053

    Original file (20080007053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Iraqi Campaign Medal, the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, and the Army Service Ribbon. Specific requirements state, in effect, that an Army enlisted Soldier must have an infantry or special forces specialty, satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008114

    Original file (20080008114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) he was assigned to a unit as an infantryman and performed the duties of an infantryman. There are no orders in his official record showing he was awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 94B and performed duties as a cook while in the RVN.