Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068463C070402
Original file (2002068463C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 02 MAY 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002068463


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Walter T. Morrison Member
Mr. Christopher J. Prosser Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)

FINDINGS :

1. The applicant has exhausted or the Board has waived the requirement for exhaustion of all administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulations.


2. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Meritorious Service Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, and the Army Commendation Medal.

3. The applicant states that he was awarded those medals but they are not reflected on his DD Form 214.

4. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army for four years on 24 February 1994. He was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 February 1994 through 23 February 1997. He was promoted to Sergeant on 1 September 1997. On 24 November 1997 the applicant reenlisted in the Army for three years. The applicant’s NCO Evaluation Reports show that he was an excellent soldier. The applicant was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal for the period 1 September 1997 to 27 August 2000.

5. The applicant was released from active duty on 23 November 2000. His DD Form 214 shows award of the Army Commendation Medal, two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, and one award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, among others. It does not show award of the Meritorious Service Medal.

6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal. That award should be reflected on his DD Form 214.

2. The applicant served his country faithfully and honorably as evidenced by his record. He should receive the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 February 1997 to 23 February 2000.

3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the Army Commendation Medal and two awards of the Army Achievement Medal. Consequently, no action on this request is required by the Board.

4. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.


RECOMMENDATION:

1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 24 February 1997 to 23 February 2000.

2. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

__FNE__ __WTM__ __CJP __ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION




                  ____Fred N. Eichorn_____
                  CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002068463
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20020502
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.00
2. 46
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072356C070403

    Original file (2002072356C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty on 21 October 1994; correction of item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) to show he served 5 years, 9 months and 2 days; correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) to show he served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (cannon crewmember) for 3 years and 6 months; and correction of item 13...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017401

    Original file (20100017401.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states he was awarded two Army Commendation Medals on 21 March 1998 and 16 May 2001, the Army Achievement Medal on 2 March 1999, Southwest Asia Service Medal on 10 November 1995, Armed Forces Service Medal on 8 March 1996, Overseas Service Ribbon for the period 1998 to 2001, United National Medal on 24 February 1999, North Atlantic Treaty Organization Medal on 14 September 2000, Expert Infantryman Badge on 10 May 1996, and Driver and Mechanic Badge with Track Vehicle Component Bar on 30...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008391

    Original file (20070008391.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 covering the period 11 January 1994 through 2 July 2003, an Army Commendation Medal Certificate, orders awarding the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), and a memorandum authorizing wear of the NATO Medal and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal as documentary evidence in support of this application. Further review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File shows award of two Army Commendation Medals during this time period as follows: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082211C070215

    Original file (2002082211C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence shows the applicant was awarded the Army Superior Unit Award for his service in Bosnia. Evidence shows the applicant was authorized wear of the Kosovo Campaign Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant was awarded the U.S. Coast Guard Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Special Operations Service Ribbon, the Army Superior Unit Award, the Kosovo Campaign Medal, and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004308C070205

    Original file (20060004308C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 23 June 1994 through 22 June 1997. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 23 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011766C070208

    Original file (20040011766C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 27 January 2000; a copy of 18th Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina memorandum, subject: Award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for Operation Uphold Democracy - Haiti, dated 5 January 1995 with an enclosure; 37th Engineer Battalion (Combat) (Airborne), Fort Bragg memorandum, subject Award of the Award of the Expeditionary Medal for Operation Uphold Democracy - Haiti, dated 25 January 1995; a copy of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011572C070208

    Original file (20040011572C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably discharged, by reason of completion of required service, effective 27 August 2004. The applicant's service record contains a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 2 October 1986, which shows in Item 13 that he was awarded the Air Force Training Ribbon. The applicant's record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 25 February 1992, which shows in Item 5 (Original DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006931C070205

    Original file (20060006931C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show two awards of the Army Commendation Medal, two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to show he was awarded two awards of the Army Achievement Medal. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008983C070205

    Original file (20060008983C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 30 November 2003; Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Hood, Texas, Orders 029-012, dated 29 January 2003, with a 1-page extract of the Attached List to Orders 029-12, dated 29 January 2003; Headquarters, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized), Baqubah, Iraq, AFYB-AR-CDR, memorandum, dated 27 July 2003, subject:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001440C070206

    Original file (20050001440C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In effect, the applicant requests that the order revoking the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) be expunged from the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). There is no evidence contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) showing that he was disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award). | |DISCHARGE REASON | | |BOARD DECISION |GRANT | |REVIEW AUTHORITY | | |ISSUES 1.