ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063254
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 March 2002 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001063254 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING __xx____ ___xxx___...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063256C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: NOTE : The Army Review Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s separation record to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal based on award...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063257C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063260C070421
The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge from the USAR should be voided and he should be issued orders transferring him to the Retired Reserve. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the United States Naval Reserve (USNR) on 6 February 1964. Inasmuch as the applicant meets eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by revoking his discharge of 3 December 1992, and assigning him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063261C070421
The following additional findings, conclusions, and recommendation were adopted by the Board. The applicant requests that the Board review his original application (AC94-08343) to correct his records to show that he was retired as a command sergeant major (CSM) (E-9). In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to further correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063262C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 5 September 1975, the applicant’s Report of Separation from Active Duty (DD Form 214) shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063263C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board must conclude that the applicant's commander, using the information available to him at that time, properly considered and accepted the applicant's request for discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063269C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063275C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the 18 December 1996 decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AC94-08328 be reversed by changing his current Army disability retirement to “regular retirement” [retirement for years of service]. c. that his records be corrected to show he was separated on 30 November 1992 and on the following day retired in the highest grade satisfactorily held under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1201(A) with a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063276C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to honorable. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063279C070421
The applicant states that his discharge shows that he was wounded on 18 May 1951, but his records do not show that award and he has never received his award of the Purple Heart. The applicant’s discharge document shows that he was wounded in action on 18 May 1951 in Korea. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Prisoner of War Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063281C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's available military records show: On 27 March 1963, the United States Court of Military Appeals denied the applicant’s Petition for Grant of Review.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063283C070421
The applicant’s military records show that she enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 May 2000 under the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Enlistment Program (ACASP) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 91C (Practical Nurse), in the pay grade of E-4. The applicant enlisted in the Army under the Army Civilian Acquired Skills Program for MOS 91C, she completed her 8 weeks of proficiency training, was awarded MOS 91C, and given an assignment as a Practical Nurse. That all of the Department of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063286C070421
On 21 July 1997, the applicant signed an Addendum to Part I of his Scholarship Contractual Agreement which acknowledged that as a cadet at the New Mexico Military Institute, Fourth Region ROTC, he was in breach of his 2-year Army ROTC Scholarship Contract; that he understood the terms of his contract; and that he had been advised that he was being provided the opportunity to repay $3,000.00 that the United States had expended in support of his educational assistance in lieu of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063293C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Evidence of record shows the applicant was in an entry level status at the time of his separation from active duty because he had served fewer than 180 days of active Federal service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063294C070421
On 14 November 2001, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for a discharge upgrade to honorable. Records further show that the separation authority considered those recommendations and determined that a general discharge was warranted by the applicant’s overall record. The Board considered the applicant’s record of service and determined that his quality of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063296C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The regulation states that item 9d (Effective Date) will show the date that the service member is separated from active duty. Orders show that the applicant was discharged from active duty on 13 July 1979.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063300C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR200106330SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED2002/03/14TYPE OF DISCHARGE(UD)DATE OF DISCHARGE19700403DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200, Chapter 10 .
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063302C070421
The applicant requests that item 18 (remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect that he received “separation” pay vice “disability severance” pay. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant entered active duty on 12 June 1990 and was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 12 August 1992. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing in item 18 of the applicant’s February 2000 DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063312C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 27 April 1978, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063314C070421
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show. On 24 November 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of service determination at the time of discharge was not consistent with the Army’s standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063318C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he should be advanced on the Retired List to the highest rank and pay grade in which he served on active duty under the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 3964 (10 USC 3964), which in his case is SFC/E-7. On 23 January 1968, the applicant submitted an application for voluntary retirement (DA Form 2339) requesting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063322C070421
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect three awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), an award of the Drivers Badge and award of the Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) V9. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded three awards of the AAM, the Drivers Badge and the ASI of V9, that were not included on his report of separation (DD Form 214) at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD). While the Board agrees that the applicant was awarded the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063329C070421
The United States Army Vietnam Casualty List shows the applicant was wounded in action on 8 December 1970. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant is entitled to award of the PH for wounds he received in action against a hostile force, two BSS on his Vietnam Service Medal, Meritorious Unit Citation, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063330C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : That he is retirement eligible, but he requested discharge rather than placement on Retired Reserve status. In October 1999, guidance announced by the Under Secretary of Defense provided that former members of the Reserve Components are entitled to certain benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063332C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In that letter the AG...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063334C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063338C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063345C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063346C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The convening authority approved the sentence on 29 April 1983; however, he set aside the portion of the sentence pertaining to the forfeiture of pay on 9 May 1983. On 17 October 1983, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate the applicant from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct, based on his disciplinary record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063348C070421
On 1 October 1999, an informal PEB found the applicant unfit for duty by reason of having insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (VA Schedule of Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 7913), under good control, with no restrictions in aerobic activity but requiring a restricted diet. Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a disability rated at less than 30 percent. The evidence of record shows...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063349C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063351C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal. The applicant states that he should have already received these medals.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063352C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 7 June 1995, his commander advised him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, based on his pattern of misconduct. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7 provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063357C070421
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he received a DA bar to reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP) based on a NCOER ending in November 1999, which indicated that he did not meet the height/weight standards of Army Regulation (AR) 600-9 and that he was enrolled in the overweight program. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Furthermore, given the applicant’s specialty and position of personnel sergeant in the unit, the applicant had a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063359C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 19 March 1974, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. On 26 February 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's second request for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063361C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063365C070421
The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components opined that the applicant was selected for promotion to major by the 1999 DA Reserve Components Selection Board with a promotion eligibility date of 30 April 1998, and was subsequently promoted on orders dated 14 January 2001 with a date or rank of 3 January 2000. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 14304 states that officers shall be placed in the promotion zone for that officer’s grade and competitive category and shall be considered for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063381C070421
On 19 February 1995, the applicant requested DFAS provide him the forms necessary to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse in order to comply with the court directive. The applicant has provided evidence to show he requested information from DFAS on how to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage within one year of his divorce. change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063382C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063385C070421
At Fort Ord, he passed the EIB test and was awarded the EIB on Permanent Orders Number 168-95, dated 30 August 1989. The available evidence shows that the applicant served in an infantry MOS and that he was assigned to an infantry unit that participated in Operation Just Cause. Should the applicant have a complete set of orders showing the purpose of those orders and including his name, he may resubmit his request for the CIB along with the supporting evidence.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063395C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 25 March 1978, the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge with a UOTHC discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063398C070421
He was issued a DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, and was returned to the Wisconsin Army National Guard. The applicant was released from active duty on 10 August 1962 and returned to state control as a member of the Wisconsin Army National Guard. In pertinent part, it directs that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for each member of the Army National Guard released after completion of 90 days or more of active duty for training.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063402C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that his discharge proceedings were not conducted in accordance with established laws and regulations in effect at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063404C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of appropriate military records to show a reenlistment (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. that an individual is eligible for Regular Army enlistment if he or she is 35 years of age or older, but less than 55 years of age, and is not more than 35 years of age, plus prior honorable active service completed in any of the U. S. Armed Forces.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063407C070421
The applicant requests that his latest DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item 10c (Record of Service – Net Active Service this Period) (sic) shows 13 years and 15 days, and that his retirement points be corrected. On his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 21 April 1991, his retirement points from 18 March 1991 to his Terminal Date of Reserve Obligation of 18 October 1992 are not shown. The evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063408C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : That he had four years of good service. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063411C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board considered the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063417C070421
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. The evidence available includes a separation document (DD Form 214) issued to the applicant on 23 June 1955. The applicant’s separation document also confirms that he was discharged for under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 for undesirable habits and traits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063420C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...