| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Walter Avery, Jr. | Analyst |
| Ms. Jennifer L. Prater | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Barbara J. Ellis | Member | |
| Mr. Thomas Lanyi | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that prior to going absent without leave (AWOL) he went through his chain-of-command to obtain permission to leave, but was denied. He went AWOL, because his son was ill. While he was AWOL his son died. When he returned to duty from AWOL he could not adjust mentally. He submits no evidence to support his request.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
He enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1975. He completed basic training but did not complete advanced individual training; therefore, he was not awarded a military occupational specialty.
On 12 February 1975, the applicant accepted non-judicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for absenting himself from his place of duty without authority. His punishment was forfeiture of $30.00 per month for one month, and restriction and extra duty for seven days. He did not appeal the punishment.
On 9 April 1975, it was noted that the applicant's unit had not been able to contact him. The applicant's father reported that the applicant had gotten married, moved to Houston, Texas, and then moved back to Beaumont, Texas, however he (the father) was unable to locate the applicant.
On 15 August 1975, the applicant's mother was informed that her son, the applicant, had been dropped from the rolls as a deserter. The applicant's commander offered that she was free to contact him if she had any questions or information.
On 22 January 1976, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant, charging that on or about 15 July 1975, absented himself from his unit without authority and did remain so absent until on or about 14 January 1976.
On 22 January 1976, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant was advised of the effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Veterans Administration benefits. He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.
On 20 January 1976, the applicant completed a separation physical examination for the purpose of a chapter 10 discharge. He was found qualified for separation.
On 27 January 1976, his company commander recommended approval of the applicant's request for separation and further recommended that he be provided an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
On 2 February 1976, the appropriate authority approved the request and directed the applicant receive an undesirable discharge.
On 3 May 1976, the applicant received an undesirable discharge, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. He had completed 10 months of creditable active service and had 183 days of lost time and 102 days of excess leave.
Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.
3. The applicant states that he went AWOL to attend to a sick son who then died. However, the Board concludes from the evidence available that the applicant made no mention of his tragic loss to his leadership upon his return from AWOL. His company commander at the time contacted both his parents and neither provided him any information to explain the reason for the applicant's misconduct. The chapter 10 discharge packet reflects that after meeting counsel, the applicant chose not to make a statement on his own behalf. The Board must conclude that the applicant's commander, using the information available to him at that time, properly considered and accepted the applicant's request for discharge.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jlp_____ ___bje__ ___tl ____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063263 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | UOTHC |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 625-200, ch 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | A70.00 |
| BOARD DECISION | |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012969
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 8 January 1976, after consulting with counsel, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trail by court-martial. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014019
The applicant requests his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 March 1976, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. On 6 April 1976, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091659C070212
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s request to be discharge was approved and on 16 January 1976 the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions and was issued an undesirable discharge certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088920C070403
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 22 July 1976 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. On 12 March 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant's request for a general discharge. The applicant’s record of service included one special court-martial conviction, three nonjudicial punishments and 67 days of lost time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064347C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general or honorable discharge. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011963
Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge under the provisions chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of a court-martial with an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022322
The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. After consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. I have almost 8 years [of] good time and I have a good record up until the time I went AWOL and I only had a year to go on my enlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107014C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge. It was not until he surrendered to military authorities that he indicated that he went AWOL because he had to take care of his family as a result of his wife deserting him and his children and there is no evidence in the available records that shows that he sought help from his superiors prior to going AWOL.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083076C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against them or of a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and they must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007759
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 29 July 1976 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service.