| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr. | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse coverage.
3. The applicant states that his former spouse was awarded the SBP when they divorced in July 1994. In February 1995, he attempted to accomplish the change through correspondence with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and, in addition, he went to his local personnel services office to complete the paperwork to effect this change. That office did not provide him with copies of the forms but assured him that they would take care of the matter. His former spouse found out in June 2001 that the change was not effected.
4. The applicant’s military records show that, after having had prior service, he reenlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 1976. He retired on 1 January 1994. At that time he enrolled in the SBP for spouse only coverage, full base amount.
5. The applicant divorced in July 1994. The divorce decree ordered him to maintain his former spouse as the SBP beneficiary and awarded her a portion of his retired pay. On 19 February 1995, the applicant requested DFAS provide him the forms necessary to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse in order to comply with the court directive. He apparently completed the necessary forms but they never reached DFAS for processing.
6. The applicant’s February 1995 Retired/Annuitant Pay Statement indicated that he was paying a former spouse allotment and had SBP premiums deducted from his retired pay.
7. On an unknown date, the applicant remarried. His current spouse concurs with his request to change his SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse coverage.
8. Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.
9. Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses for retiring members. This law also decreed that state courts could treat military retired pay as community property in divorce cases if they so chose. It established procedures by which a former spouse could receive all or a portion of that court settlement as a direct payment from the service finance center.
10. Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).
11. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.
12. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP. It permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce. If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant has provided evidence to show he requested information from DFAS on how to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage within one year of his divorce. He believed this change was taken care of when he completed some forms at his local personnel service office. Since at least one of his Retired/Annuitant Pay Statements indicated that he was paying a former spouse allotment and that SBP premiums were being deducted from his pay, it is reasonable to presume he may have believed that the two entries were directly related to each other and that his SBP coverage had been changed.
2. The applicant has indicated that it was and is his intent to comply with the court order to change his SBP election to former spouse. His current spouse has concurred in his request.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that on 19 February 1995 the applicant made a written request to
change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.
BOARD VOTE:
__rvo___ __eja___ __rks___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2001063381 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020131 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 137.04 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064691C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The applicant states, through counsel, that the FSM and the applicant were granted a divorce on 16 November 1995. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011742
The applicant requests correction of the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), as follows: * by showing he timely elected to change his election in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage on 19 November 1994 * by showing the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) timely processed this change in election * by paying her an SBP annuity as the former spouse retroactive to the date of the FSM's death on 6 March...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019867
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. It would now be appropriate to correct the injustice by showing the applicant requested a deemed election of the SBP under the terms of the divorce decree within 1 year of the divorce in 1994. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010612
The applicant requests that the records of her former spouse, a retired former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he timely filed a request with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse in accordance with the Final Decree of Divorce granted by the 27th District Court of Lampasas County, Texas. Her request was denied on 28 March 1996 because it was not timely filed within one year of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001548
The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that she be provided an annuity under the FSMs Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008327C070205
She also states, in effect, at the time of their divorce the court ordered the FSM to provide SBP coverage and designate the applicant as the beneficiary. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant made a written request of deemed election to DFAS for former spouse SBP coverage based on the divorce decree. However, the evidence of record fails to show that either the FSM or the applicant took the necessary action to change the FSM’s SBP election from spouse to former spouse...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010940
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at the time of retirement or that she submitted a deemed election request in a timely manner. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP child coverage only at the time of his retirement on 31 March 2006. There is no evidence that the applicant notified DFAS within 1 year of the divorce and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000664
Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the members agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085250C070212
The applicant states that the court ordered divorce decree required him to provide SBP coverage, with his FS as the beneficiary, with the proviso that the FS make all necessary payments required for continuation of coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011173
The divorce decree states that the applicant is named beneficiary under the Armed Services SBP and that the FSM's election to provide the SBP benefits to the applicant should be continued and maintained in full force and effect and should not be altered or withdrawn by the FSM during his lifetime. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is...