| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | |
| Ms. Karen A. Heinz | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable or general.
APPLICANT STATES: That he had four years of good service. He was stationed in Germany and Vietnam, then at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. He was taking drugs and drinking heavily and received an undesirable discharge. He hasn’t taken drugs or drank for over 30 years, nor has he been in any trouble. He has been married to the same woman. They have four children and nine grandchildren. He is sorry for what he did.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
The applicant enlisted in the Army for four years on 8 February 1966, completed training, and in August 1966 was reassigned to a cavalry squadron in Germany. He was promoted to pay grade E-4 in February 1967. On 20 April 1967 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, for being absent from his unit and for failing to pay a debt. In August 1967 the applicant departed Germany and was transferred to a supply company in Vietnam. On 26 January 1968 he received nonjudicial punishment for sleeping at his guard post. He completed his tour in Vietnam and returned to the United States at Fort Bragg in November 1968. On 5 December 1968 he received nonjudicial punishment for disobeying a lawful regulation and for failing to go to his place of duty. On 22 January 1969 the applicant reenlisted in the Army for six years.
Beginning in March 1969 the applicant began a series of AWOLs lasting through May 1970. During that period he had 393 days of AWOL, and 10 days of civil confinement. He was confined by military authorities on 14 May 1970.
On 18 June 1970 the applicant consulted with counsel and under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court martial for an offense punishable by a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the under other than honorable conditions discharge that he might receive. He declined to submit statements in his own behalf. The applicant’s commanding officer recommended approval of his request, and recommended that the applicant be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The separation authority approved the applicant’s request and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.
The applicant was discharged at Fort Campbell, Kentucky on 14 July 1970. He had 3 years, 8 months, and 26 days of service, and 403 days of lost time.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress. The applicant's request for a chapter 10 discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with a military lawyer, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial and the punitive discharge that he might have received.
2. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
3. While the Board is empathetic, the applicant's good post service conduct is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.
4. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.
6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__AAO __ __MHM _ __KAH __ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063408 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020129 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 110.00 |
| 2. | 189 |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071659C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He further states that he served two tours in Vietnam, received many awards during his 7 years of service, and was promotable to the pay grade of E-6. He was transferred to Vietnam on 26 August 1970.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019123
Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), dated 19 April 1966, shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000057
The applicant, a Vietnam Veterans of America Regional Director, requests, on behalf of the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), that the FSM's discharge be upgraded from an undesirable discharge (UD) to a general discharge (GD). Consistent with the FSM's chain of command's recommendations, the separation authority approved the FSM's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial, and directed that he be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007120
The applicant requests: * an upgrade of his under honorable conditions discharge to a fully honorable discharge * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal and Purple Heart 2. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with a general discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014028
On 17 June 1971, the convening authority preferred court-martial charges against him for one specification of being AWOL from on or about 2 September 1970 to on or about 10 June 1971. In his request for discharge, the applicant acknowledged that he understood that if the discharge request was approved, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005052
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his under conditions other than honorable discharge to a general under honorable conditions discharge. Headquarters, 1st Support Command, Fort Bragg, NC, Special Court-Martial Order Number 112, dated 31 July 1973 shows he was found guilty of being AWOL from 4 June 1973 to 25 June 1973.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007930C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge and that his rank and pay grade be restored to sergeant, E-5. The application submitted in this case is dated 28 May 2006 and was received for processing on 7 June 2006. Documents related to the applicant's discharge show that on 27 May 1970, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 10.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072735C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. He volunteered for duty in Vietnam on 27 November 1967 and departed Germany on 14 May 1968, with a report date to Oakland Army Base, California, on 9 June 1968.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074704C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. It required the establishment of uniform published standards which did not provide for automatically granting or denying a discharge upgrade for any case or class of cases. The Board reviewed the applicant's record of service which included five nonjudicial punishments, a summary court-martial, a special court-martial, and 387...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010073
The applicant states: * He received a clemency discharge issued pursuant to Presidential Proclamation Number 4313 (PP 4313) * He went into the Army at age 17 * He served in Germany and Vietnam * He got hepatitis C while he was in the Army and has been suffering 32 years * He needs treatment at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) because he cant get insurance 3. On 2 October 1971, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service...