| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Walter T. Morrison | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his bad conduct discharge(BCD) be upgraded to a more favorable discharge.
APPLICANT STATES: That he volunteered to go overseas but the Army would not let him go, even after his lawyer tried to get them to send him to Vietnam. He further states that he has tried to be a citizen that the United States can be proud of.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records were lost by the applicant at the time he went absent without leave (AWOL); however, reconstructed records show:
He was inducted in Rayville, Louisiana on 15 September 1966. He successfully completed his training at Fort Sill, Oklahoma and received orders transferring him to Vietnam for duty as a field artillery cannoneer, effective 4 March 1967.
The applicant went AWOL on 4 March 1967 and remained absent until he surrendered to military control at Kessler Air Force Base on 4 September 1970. He was transferred to Fort Rucker, Alabama on 9 September 1970, where records were reconstructed and charges were preferred against him.
At the time he was returned to military control, the applicant indicated that he had hand carried his records when he departed Fort Sill and that they were lost during the AWOL period.
He plead guilty to charges against him and was convicted by a general court-martial on 23 November 1970, of being AWOL from 4 March 1967 to 4 September 1970. He was sentenced to a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 9 months and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. On 10 February 1971, the Army Court of Military Review affirmed his conviction.
Prior to the applicant’s sentencing, the applicant made a statement to the judge whereas he asserted that he had used all of his money to pay a hospital bill for a man whom he looked on as a father and when he attempted to get money from the Red Cross to return to Oakland Army Base, he was denied. He further stated that he was confused, did not know what to do and became afraid to return. He worked on shrimp boats until he surrendered to military authorities.
The applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions, pursuant to his court-martial conviction, on 14 June 1971. He had served 8 months and 9 days of total active service and had 1,482 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore appear to be appropriate considering the available facts of the case and his otherwise undistinguished record of service during such a short period of time.
3. The applicant’s contention that he wanted to go overseas and was denied, is not supported by the available evidence of record. The records clearly show that he received orders for Vietnam and never reported to the replacement company for shipment.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___rks __ __wtm __ ___clg___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001063349 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 2002/04/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1971/06/14 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | GCM |
| DISCHARGE REASON | Cm conv |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 675 | 144.6800/A68.00/bcd |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004196
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070004196 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Senator states, in effect, that the applicant served honorably in the Republic of Vietnam for 7 months prior to his return to the United States on rest and recuperation leave. Army Regulation 630-10 (Absence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086497C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations it is concluded: The applicant's contention that he was young and immature at the time is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007153
The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 9 June 1972, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that an Undesirable Discharge Certificate be issued and that he be reduced to pay grade E-1. His military records also contain no evidence which would entitle him to a further upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608775C070209
He was in confinement from 7 August 1968 until 2 January 1969. On 16 September 1969 the applicants commanding officer recommended that the applicant be discharged for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212. He stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the undesirable discharge that he might receive.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007407C070205
The applicant requests that the undesirable discharge of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be upgraded to honorable. She also states that the FSM’s brother was just a cook and got his discharge changed and he did not see what the FSM saw in Vietnam. Chapter 10 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after charges have been...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072735C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. He volunteered for duty in Vietnam on 27 November 1967 and departed Germany on 14 May 1968, with a report date to Oakland Army Base, California, on 9 June 1968.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003083C070205
Thomas Ray | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074953C070403
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010522C071029
James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In November 1977, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. The applicant’s record of service does not warrant granting the relief requested and there is insufficient evidence that would warrant upgrading it as a matter of clemency.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007930C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge and that his rank and pay grade be restored to sergeant, E-5. The application submitted in this case is dated 28 May 2006 and was received for processing on 7 June 2006. Documents related to the applicant's discharge show that on 27 May 1970, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 10.