AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05878
On 27 Apr 11, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Unsatisfactory Duty Performance Failure to Meet Minimum Fitness Standards. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 25 Jun 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05880
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTS recommends denial. The Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) conducted a review of the applicants National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) records and there are no documents that identify the applicants participation on active duty during December 1971. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05881
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05881 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Observer Wings In Accordance With (IAW) AFR 50-7, Aeronautical Ratings and Requirements for their Attainment, dated 13 Mar 53. In an application dated 30 Dec 12, the applicant requested an exception to policy to AFR 50-7 due to the fact that he was in a TDY status to an Air Force unit while...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) from active duty be adjusted to reflect the day before his Reserve appointment date in order to remove a break in service. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he was commissioned in the Regular Air Force, in the grade of second lieutenant (2nd Lt),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05885
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05885 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflected her current name and gender. In support of her requests, the applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge; birth certificate, probate court orders, drivers license, passport and various other documents...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05886
f. The disenrollment authority states the applicant had been reminded of his responsibilities on numerous occasions. He must be referring to the AFROTC Form 16, Officer Candidate Counseling Record, which is the only possible document cadets receive on numerous occasions. However, the AFROTC Form 16 is silent as to prescription drug use. On 21 Oct 12, the applicants commander recommended he be disenrolled from AFROTC. The applicant failed to maintain military retention standards and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05889
On 25 Feb 02, applicant was informed that the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) denied his request to upgrade his discharge. A complete copy of the Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation(s) were forwarded to the applicant on 23 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). With regards to the applicants request to restore his ribbons and medals, we recommend no action be taken as no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05892
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Airmans Medal (AmnM) for his heroic actions performed on 26 Sep 03. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicants request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05896
Also, there is no evidence DFAS received a request from the applicant deeming a SBP election during the first year following the divorce. Subsequently, on 14 September 2012, a second DD Form 2656-10 was forwarded to DFAS; however, DFAS did not honor the applicants request because the 16 June 2011 court order was dated after the members retirement date. The member elected SBP coverage for his former spouse a month prior to establishing SBP coverage for his current spouse.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05935
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05935 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 06222
AFBCMR BC-2013-00622 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013-00043
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00043 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1982-03461-2
AFBCMR Dear APPLICANT: This is in response to your undated letter requesting reconsideration of your application for correction of your military records, AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1982-03461. We have carefully examined your request for reconsideration, and find it does not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board. As previously stated, reconsideration is authorized only where newly discovered relevant evidence is presented which was not available when the application was submitted.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1988-03555-1
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1988-03555 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He now lives a drug and alcohol free life and is employed as a professional firefighter/EMT-B and educator. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1990-00576
On 11 Sep 1989, the applicant requested the AFBCMR correct his record to reflect that he be retried, or a further examination of his trial be made. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the UCMJ. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-1994-02998
The AFBCMR issued AFBCMR Directive 94-02998 (Corrected Copy), dated 17 Jan 96, directing the two contested OPRs be declared void and removed from her records; her records be corrected to show she was not released from her AGR position on 12 Jul 91, but continued to serve until 11 May 94, at which point she would have attained 20 years of total active federal military service (TAFMS); on 12 May 94, she was released from her AGR tour and transferred to the Reserve; and, her corrected records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2002-01953-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit E and G, respectively. Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 24 November 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2004-02769-4
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Second Addendum to Record of Proceedings at Exhibit L. The applicant provides three DD Forms 149, dated 6 Jun 11, 17 Nov 11, and 20 Feb 12, respectively, with additional documents to support his claim. In addition, the applicant is reminded that the Military Disability Evaluation System (MDES) only offers compensation for the medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2007-02340
Captain Hs---- -- second BCMR application was granted once the AFOSI discovered extensive and irrefutable evidence to what the Commander, AFOSI labeled as clear and disturbing evidence of criminal misconduct on behalf of Captain H------s commander. The applicant contends that this is the same commander who abused his authority with him, and whom he had been attempting for years to get the Air Force to at least investigate his actions. The applicant asserts that his former...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2007-02621-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with Exhibits, at Exhibit F. On 10 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense issued guidance pertaining to correction of military records requests resulting from the repeal of Title 10, Section 654, the law commonly known as Dont Ask, Dont Tell (DADT). In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 11, the Under Secretary of Defense...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2007-03875
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). While we note the comments from the Air Force OPR indicating the applicant has not substantiated the contested EPR was not rendered accurately by all evaluators at the time, we believe the documentation submitted by the applicant, specifically, the replacement EPR signed in 2009 by all three of the official signatories on the EPR in question, as well as signed memoranda from every member of his chain of command at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2008-00785-1
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00785 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). In support of this request, he submits a certificate of volunteer service, college transcripts and a college acceptance...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2009-00802
The Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). However, the award criteria for the ACM states no member shall be entitled to both the GWOT-E medal for that service. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009- 00802: Exhibit E. Record of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2009-01011
Therefore, in view of the fact that we previously determined the applicant should be eligible to pursue reenlistment, provided he is otherwise qualified, and noting that his service characterization, authority and reason for separation, and SPD code were based solely on the accusation that he had purposefully ingested an illegal substance, we believe the applicants records should be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2009-03818-2
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 26 Oct 10, a similar appeal was considered by the Board where the applicant requested two referral reports, closing 4 Dec 07, and 8 Jul 08, and a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 14 Feb 08, be removed from her record and her record was corrected to reflect the following: a. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2010-04456
They further advised, that before submitting a DD Form 149 requesting a change to her military record, the applicant must go back to the original approval authority of the AFCM and request administrative relief in accordance with AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Awards and Decorations Program, paragraphs, 1.5, 1.7, 3.3.8, and 3.4.2. In addition to reiterating previous contentions, they additionally contend that: a. AFI 36-2803, paragraphs 2.2.2 and 2.2.3., provide that; recommendations for Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-00249-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00249 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded. This is her second request, for the first request was denied just prior to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-00933-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request to have his record reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. The applicant submits a request for reconsideration, providing a witness statement from a former servicemember that he served with in Thailand. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides an email with the attached witness statement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-01437
He was 46 years old and had 29 years of service for retirement. He believes that if he would have been offered a commission when he entered pilot training, he would have been a general officer when he retired. We note the applicant states at the time of his retirement his commanding officer advised him that he had been recommended for promotion to the grade of permanent colonel.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-02061
_______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, the applicant and the decedent were married on 29 May 1961. After the death of the retired member, the widow provided a sworn statement that she did not receive notification that her husband had declined SBP coverage. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-02361
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-IN recommends denial, indicating that in order for their office to pay for unused leave, copies of the service member’s final Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) is required. The applicant did not file within three years...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-02656
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicants request that he be provided an honorable discharge certificate for his initial period...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2011-04704
He elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay, and his wife concurred in his election. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 19 Jan 2012, the applicant requested additional time to provide supplementary evidence in support of her request and her case was administratively closed. In the absence of evidence that there was a “deemed election” by the applicant within one year 3 after the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00001
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00001 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) instead of the Air Force Commendation Medal for saving the life of an active duty dependent. _______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00021
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D, E, and G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his 19 Feb 2010 FA from the AFFMS. DPSIM states the applicant is requesting his FA dated 19 Feb 2010 be removed from the AFFMS. The complete DPSID evaluation, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00130-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00130 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: (FMR SERVICE MEMBER) (APPLICANT) ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former-spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). However, the service member has since provided a notarized...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00187
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The period 30 May 2008 through 14 Oct 2011 is recorded as lost time on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00212-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00212 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. After careful reconsideration of all the facts and circumstances of the applicant’s case, along with the additional documentation provided, it remains the opinion of the Board the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00274
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial noting that under AFI 36-3212 and in accordance with 10 USC 61, a condition must be found “in line of duty,” service-incurred, or permanently aggravated by military service in order to qualify as a compensable disorder. As for the applicant’s request to correct his record to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits, other than his own...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00276
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant’s records contain documentation indicating that he was awarded the MSM twice (basic award and first OLC), the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00496
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Silver Star (SS). In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of a letter from his brother requesting administrative relief for the SS and PH, dated 15 Feb 94. We note the OPR has verified the applicant’s 2 entitlement...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00565
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-00565 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00570
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge was improper because, per Air Force Regulations, his is totally disabled, yet he was denied an evaluation by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) that would have resulted in his being retired for medical reasons. Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI), Physical Disability Evaluation, paragraph E3.P3.2.1., reads: “A Service member shall be considered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00586
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00586 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his UOTHC discharge upgraded to honorable. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00624
It appears that the Air Force appropriately considered the applicant's conditions and whether or not they rendered him unfit to perform the duties of his office and grade at that time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00659
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00659 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00887
On 1 May 85 and 18 Nov 93, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered the applicant’s appeal to have her discharge upgraded; however, they concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discharge authority’s discretion, and denied her requests. Additionally, the applicant’s discharge was supported by three (3) Letters of Reprimand, three (3) Letters of Counseling, and other documents...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00979
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00979 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Line of Duty (LOD) Determination, dated 16 November 2011, for allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis be changed from Existed Prior to Service - Not Applicable (EPTS/NA) to In the Line of Duty (ILOD) or Existed Prior to Service Aggravated...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01014
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not advised prior to her separation that she had to transfer her benefits while still on active duty and that she was to serve on or after 1 August 2009. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate...