AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05742
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05742 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05744
DPSI recommends the Board direct the applicants record be corrected to show that any and all references to his medical condition and the withholding of information about his medical condition be removed from paragraph 3B and 3C of the updated Training Eliminee letter received by AFPC/DPSIP on 6 Nov 12 and Section 4 of the AETC Form 125A, Record of Administrative Action, dated 27 Apr 12. Although the OPR recommends the applicants record be considered for reclassification and retention by...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05748
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05748 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 3K (Secretarial Authority) be changed to a 1 RE code series that would allow him to reenlist. The board concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05749 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) reflect Yes rather than No. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He contributed to VEAP. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05753
On 19 Jun 13, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) determined the applicant was unfit to perform his duties due to the major trauma to his right eye. On 26 Aug 13, the Personnel Board of the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) reviewed the applicants case and determined him to be unfit for continued military duty on the basis of his right eye conditions. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05757
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, notarized statements from members who attest to his service in Vietnam, photographs and various other documents related to his request. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He requested a copy of his records from St. Louis; however, when he received his records, included were documents from another military member. The DVA accepted the statements from his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05761
In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, dated 21 Oct 13, any military member can appeal their FA through a wing-level appeals board and then through the AFPC Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) within two years of discovering the error/injustice. The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05763
On 26 Feb 13, the Director, Military Personnel Human Resources Directorate was notified that the applicant was awarded the JSCM, dated 9 May 12, and was subsequently awarded the JSCM (1OLC), dated 11 Oct 12, for the same act and period. There is no evidence in the applicants record, nor did the applicant provide any official documentation verifying he or his chain of command attempted to exhaust administrative avenues by requesting reconsideration of the downgrade through the original...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05770
Moreover, under paragraph E3.P3.3.3, Adequate Performance Until Referral, If the evidence establishes that the service member adequately performed his or her duties until the time the service member was referred for physical evaluation, the member may be considered fit for duty even though medical evidence indicates questionable physical ability to continue to perform duty. Moreover, noting the applicant had achieved the maximum number of years of service allowed by Air Force policy, had...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05775
He had to extend to obtain retainability; however, he was counseled that he would be able to cancel his extension or reenlist on top of time served upon graduation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05778
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05778 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her military records be corrected to show that she was not released from active duty on 1 Sep 11, but was instead was continued on active duty for the purposes of medical continuation (MEDCON) until her disability retirement on 29 Aug 13, the date of final disposition of her Integrated Disability Evaluation System...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05779
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05779 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants request to change his grade to SSgt on his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05783
In support of his requests, the applicant provides a 21-page memorandum, copies of the FEB findings and recommendations, Administrative Discharge Board findings, AF Form 3070C, Record of NJP Proceedings (Officer); LOE, OPR, AF Form 8 and various other documents associated with his requests. However, if the incident demonstrates unacceptable performance or an intentional disregard of regulations or procedures, a recommendation to disqualify is appropriate. Further, paragraph 4.6.4.,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05790
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial with respect to the applicants request for the SS or BSM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFHRA/RS evaluation is at Exhibit D. SAF/PC recommends denial to award the SS or BSM,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05791
According to his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, the applicant was transferred to the Air Force Reserve (ANG) Retired List on 30 Jun 11. According to an AF Form 1288, Application for Ready Reserve Assignment, dated 9 Dec 10, provided by the applicant, the Reserve recruiter recommended to RMG, Det 11 that he be approved for transfer to the Air Force Reserve and certified that he met eligibility requirement for assignment into the Air Force Reserve. THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05794
On 29 Dec 03, the applicants commander recommended the applicant be involuntarily discharged from the Air Force Reserve for a condition that interfered with his military service. A complete copy of the AFRC/SG evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates he has never requested any psychiatric counseling or evaluation. His primary care provider since 2009 has provided a statement indicating the applicant has not and does not have an Axis...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05797
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to have his referral OPR expunged from his record, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The LOR and the referral OPR that documents his misconduct are both legally sufficient, and there was no material error in the base for, or administration of, these actions. While the Board notes the applicants contentions that the allegedly falsified document...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05799
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05799 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 28, narrative reason, be changed from failed medical/physical procurement standards, to an appropriate status that indicates he was discharged for an injury incurred while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05805
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicants post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicants accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05806
Having received and considered the FA appeal request on the applicant, under authority of AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) has disapproved action because the applicant has provided no specific details pertaining to the purported medical condition. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the contested referral EPRs indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05809
(Administratively resolved) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the AFCM (2BOLC) at the time of his retirement and he would like his DD Form 214 corrected to reflect this. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the applicants request to amend his DD Form 214 reflecting the award of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following: 1. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Dec 13, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05813
The pattern of maladaptive behavior exhibited near the beginning of BMT is more consistent with the assigned mental health diagnosis of schizotal (schizotypal) personality disorder, not schizophrenia. The complete Medical evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A representative from the state Office of Veterans Affairs states the applicants 100 percent service connected disability was recognized by the Air Force as a personality disorder (schizophrenia) and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05814
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05814 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect that he served in Vietnam. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his application since he has been trying to get his records changed to no avail...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05816
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05816 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official personnel records [referred to as St Louis Records by the applicant] and DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to address the following errors: 1. Credit for foreign Service time in Vietnam should be two (2) months and three (3) days. After a review of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05819
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05819 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Based on a review of the record, JAJM finds no error or injustice with the military justice process which would warrant upgrading the applicants discharge to a general (under honorable conditions)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05823
On 21 Jul 14, the applicant was advised that the AFBCMR is the highest administrative level of appeal in the Air Force and that he should exhaust all other available avenues of relief prior to seeking relief through the AFBCMR. In this respect, we note this Board is the highest administrative level of appeal within the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05824
The May 09 award policy and award criteria message that was released Air Force wide provides the applicable regulation concerning award of the LOM. DPSID believes the applicant should be given consideration for a retirement decoration; however, in order for his request to be reasonably considered he will need to resubmit his request with an ETP memorandum signed by someone from his chain of command with first-hand knowledge of the act/achievement due to the applicant not meeting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05825
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15 imposed on 4 Mar 13 be removed from his records. However, this error does not warrant setting aside the entire NJP as the applicant requests. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05826
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Mar 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05829
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05829 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)," be changed to allow him reentry into the Air Force. On 29 September 2012, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05831
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05831 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of Discharge Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service be changed to Erroneous Enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has not taken the disqualifying...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833
After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05840
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05840 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, item 11, Primary Specialty, reflect M46A3, Medical Service Specialty, Nursing Administrator, 8 years; M46S3, Medical Service Specialty, Operating Room Nurse, 17 years; and 46N3, Clinical Nurse, 3 years. An officers DAFSC must match an awarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05844
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05844 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. We note the applicant has cited two cases in which the charges against one military member were cleared and in the other case the members record was expunged. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board majority finds no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05845
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05845 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, due to the applicants failure to provide information regarding his post-service activities, we cannot conclude that such...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05847
He obtained the necessary retainability, his intentions were documented on his AF Form 901 and the fact the MilConnect and VMPF does not reflect that he qualified for the TEB, on 13 Sep 11, reflects a clear disservice to him. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, the Board majority recommends approval. We note AFPC/DPSIT states there is no evidence the applicant applied for the TEB in MILCONNECT or signed the SOU.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05849
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05849 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two additional Air Force Commendation Medals (AFCM). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05852
Recommend the Board change the applicants DAS to SJAFB to reflect 28 May 13 since this is the day the Join Spouse assignment was approved by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) and also this is the day the applicant was officially assigned to SJAFB. AFMAN 65-116V1, Defense Joint Military Pay System Active Component (DJMS-AC) FSO Procedures, paragraph 41.2.3.1.2.2. states If the member takes leave in the local area of the new PDS (Permanent Duty Station) without contacting the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05855
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. His punishment consisted of forfeiture of $100.00 of pay per month for two months and a reduction to the grade of airman, suspended until 5 March 1973, at which time, unless the suspension was sooner vacated, it would be remitted without further action. On 28 February 1974, the applicant was furnished with a BCD, and was credited with 2 years, 3 months, and 3 days of active service, excluding lost time from 5 April 1973 to 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05857
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial because the applicant has not exhausted her administrative remedies. The applicant states that her referral EPR, should not have made it to administrative personnel after the Additional Rater and Reviewer non-concurred with the unjust rating. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05858
In support of her request, she submits copies of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and DD Forms 256 AF, Honorable Discharge Certificate. The application was received more than three years since the alleged error or injustice was discovered; therefore, the request is not timely. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 14, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05859
The reasons for the referral OPR were wrongful sexual contact with one female employee and sexual harassment of multiple female employees for which he received a LOR, UIF and CR action. Based upon the presumed sufficiency of the LOR, UIF and CR as served to the applicant, DPSID concludes that its mention on the contested report was proper and IAW all applicable Air Force policies and procedures. A complete copy of the DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05860
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military personnel records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The circumstances that prevented the applicant from obtaining points were that his overage contract was discontinued, FY12 annual training was denied due to lack of funding and late acquisition of funds did not allow him to participate in IDTs for the greater part of FY12 and RYE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05864
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the board determine if the applicant's actions from 5 August 2003 to 20 November 2003 warrant award of the MSM Second Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster. The recommendation package provided by the applicant only states the request is for the MSM; however, due to the applicant previously receiving award of the MSM First Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster, this current request should be considered as a request for the MSM Medal Second Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster. THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05866
According to Title 10 USC § 1448(a) the member may elect to discontinue participation in the Plan at any time during the one-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which payment of retired pay to the participant commences. At this time, the member can choose to decline SBP coverage, however; the member will still be responsible for the RCSBP portion of the coverage. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Sep 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05867
According to a letter dated 18 Mar 13, the applicants CRSC application for degenerative arthritis of the spine (lumbar) and tinnitus was disapproved due to insufficient documentation. The supporting documentation provided does not confirm a combat- related event as the cause of his tinnitus, and injuries incurred during fire fighter training do not meet simulated war criteria. The documentation provided does not indicate a combat- related event caused the applicants back condition.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05869
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 15 Sep 61, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his undesirable discharge. On 23 May 67, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05872
In support of her appeal the applicant submits a personal memorandum to the board and a letter from her commander requesting the contested FA be invalidated. At the time the application was submitted, the applicant had not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05876
The applicants first TEB application clearly stated the service member must use the vMPF to complete the TEB SOU. It also stated if the service member did not meet the retainability requirements and failed to sign the TEB SOU within 14 days, the application would be rejected. He was provided a TEB extension until 16 Nov 11; however, he failed to sign the TEB SOU.