SECOND
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01953-3
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Similar appeals were considered and denied by the Board on
5 February 2002 and 24 November 2009. For an accounting of the
facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and
the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit
E and G, respectively.
In a letter to the Board dated 18 March 2013, the applicant
requests reconsideration that her bad conduct discharge be
upgraded based on a recent background report.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit H.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In earlier findings, the Board determined there was insufficient
evidence to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly
reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of
this appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the
applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in the previous
decisions. Therefore, we do not find the additional evidence
presented is sufficient to warrant the relief sought on that
basis. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis upon which to recommend favorable consideration of the
applicants request.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2002-01953-3 in Executive Session on 6 June 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Although XXXXX chaired the panel, in view of his
unavailability, XXXXXX has agreed to sign as Acting Panel
Chair. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 13 Feb 2003,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated
24 November 2009, w/atchs.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01953 3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decisions by the Board, see Exhibit E and G, respectively. Exhibit G. Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 24 November 2009, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 March 2013, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00130-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00130 COUNSEL: NONE IN THE MATTER OF: (FMR SERVICE MEMBER) (APPLICANT) ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former-spouse’s records be corrected to reflect he made a timely election for former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). However, the service member has since provided a notarized...
AF | BCMR | CY1991 | BC 1991 01020 5
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-1991-01020 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. On 14 February 1953, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order 91, with a BCD. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00052-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G. The applicant submitted a letter, with attachments, requesting reconsideration of his case. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03156 ADDENDUM
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board on 5 June 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of his appeal and the evidence of record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale expressed in our previous decision. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00608A
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding her request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. On 27 Nov 06 and 2 May 07, the applicant’s requests for reconsideration of her application were denied because she did not provide evidence meeting the criteria for reconsideration. See Exhibits G and H. On 1 May 08, the applicant provided additional documentation through her Congressional...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02611-2
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. On 30 November 2012, the applicants counsel submitted a request for reconsideration based on their submission of affidavits from the applicants former husband (member) and his current spouse agreeing to the requested relief and voluntarily relinquishing all rights and/or benefits under the members pre- and post-retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-00960-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale for the earlier decisions by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F and the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. In a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States, dated 27 April 2007, the applicant requests reconsideration. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit I. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01973-2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 01973 2
________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Panel Chair AFBCMR 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base...