Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2000 | Test
Original file (Test.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DocuShare Concept of Operations

Program Concept
- Customizable commercial off-the-shelfsoftware product from Xerox
- Vastly simplifies publication to the web

Primary Uses in TJAG Department
- JA offices can create their own mini-versions of FLITE to store and research local work-product
- Offices may be able to do electronic record keeping in DocuShare
- Built-in features such as search engine and web site production could replace parts of FLITE architecture
- Guest access makes it possible to run public sites on DocuShare
- Materials added to DocuShare without access restrictions will add to FLITE content through Spider

DocuShare Features
- All files and folders can be password protected and access restricted
- Publishing, sharing, and searching files on the Internet similar to a LAN environment
- Shortens basic web site publishing learning curve from days to hours
- Drag and drop publishing to the Internet for files or entire folder
- Automatically builds web pages based on contents of folders (users don’t need FrontPage or HTML)
- Verity Search engine allow full text search ofmost file types
- Can be customized to meet Department’s special needs
- Uses proven Internet standards XML HTML, ODMA, Python, Verity Search engine

Evaluation Completed
- JAS DocuShare Site in use by selected offices since April (under evaluation license)
- DocuShare is compatible with JAS/FLITE computer equipment and software
- Test users at AFJAGS, JAJG, JAJA have loaded over 7000 documents including SJA Course Materials

Implementation
- JAS procured unlimited user enterprise-wide license in August
- All 6800 FLITE IDs have been loaded in
- Unlimited license allows use by Reserve Componentjudge advocates
- Release announcement in early October 1999
- All users/organization will be hosted on JAS servers at Maxwell during first year
- Local servers may make sense for some offices, separate purchase necessary
- Presently acquiring more robust backup and second server, may eventually need document server

Cost — Benefit Analysis
- Enterprise License price of$3 8000 reduces computer purchases by 19 units
- Annual maintenance costs will reduce computer purchases by 6 units per years
- More than offset by

-- Attorney-paralegal search time greatly reduced
-- File storage areas reduced (motorized file cabinet costs $20,000)
-- Web publishing training time and learning curve saved
-- Similar products cost 3 to 10 times more per seat

Risk Analysis
- JAS secures the host server and files with standard JAS server security package
- User ID and password system are built into DocuShare
- Security can be implemented at the file or folder level based on user or group of users
- HTTPS SSL secure server mode is a built-in DocuShare feature we may implement later

Exit Strategy
- Some DocuShare functions may eventually be replaced by features in new Windows or Office software
or Air Force standard records management systems
- DocuShare allows easy transition to different system with Windows Explorer drag and drop feature

AFLSA/JASX, Maj Doug Murdock, DSN 493-4185

9/20/99 9:18 AM



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | AFBCMR Decision

    Original file (AFBCMR Decision.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DocuShare Administration screens support five administration categories, corresponding to chapters two through six of this manual. Other administrative functions, such as changing a user’s password, are available anywhere in the site when logged into DocuShare using an administrator account. Administrator Tips and Suggestions Additional tips for managing a DocuShare site such as Managing Repository Growth, Backup Suggestions, Rotating Log Files and Object Restoration.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | AFBCMR Decision

    Original file (AFBCMR Decision.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DocuShare Administration screens support five administration categories, corresponding to chapters two through six of this manual. Other administrative functions, such as changing a user’s password, are available anywhere in the site when logged into DocuShare using an administrator account. Administrator Tips and Suggestions Additional tips for managing a DocuShare site such as Managing Repository Growth, Backup Suggestions, Rotating Log Files and Object Restoration.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | AFBCMR Decision

    Original file (AFBCMR Decision.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DocuShare Administration screens support five administration categories, corresponding to chapters two through six of this manual. Other administrative functions, such as changing a user’s password, are available anywhere in the site when logged into DocuShare using an administrator account. Administrator Tips and Suggestions Additional tips for managing a DocuShare site such as Managing Repository Growth, Backup Suggestions, Rotating Log Files and Object Restoration.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1997 | AFBCMR Decision

    Original file (AFBCMR Decision.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DocuShare Administration screens support five administration categories, corresponding to chapters two through six of this manual. Other administrative functions, such as changing a user’s password, are available anywhere in the site when logged into DocuShare using an administrator account. Administrator Tips and Suggestions Additional tips for managing a DocuShare site such as Managing Repository Growth, Backup Suggestions, Rotating Log Files and Object Restoration.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001334

    Original file (20150001334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration, in part, of his earlier request for: * removal of all references to the applicant's Army Grade Determination Board (AGDRB) decision and reduction in rank/grade from colonel (COL)/O-6 to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) * correction of the applicant's retired rank/grade to show COL/O-6 2. b. Paragraph 4a states, "Members of the United States Armed Forces, and other persons serving with, employed by or accompanying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03086

    Original file (BC-2002-03086.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Jul 00, the applicant was notified by his Wing Commander that he was considering whether to recommend to the Numbered Air Force (NAF) Commander that he be punished under Article 15 for alleged misconduct in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, in that he did on divers occasions, between on or about 9 Nov 99 and on or about 25 Jan 00, fail to obey a lawful general regulation, to wit: paragraph 6, Air Force Instruction 33-129, Transmission of Information via the...

  • CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2007-031

    Original file (2007-031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On June 8, 2005, the XO of the parent MSO sent a letter to the Assistant Chief of the MSO’s Investigations Department, a retired Coast Guard LCDR, assigning him to serve “as the preliminary investigating officer [PIO] for the alleged UCMJ offenses that occurred on various dates between July 2004 and May 2005 and are recorded on the enclosed CG Form 4910.” Temporary Relief for Cause On June 16, 2005, the XO, who was then Acting CO of the MSO, recommended to the District Commander that the...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-191

    Original file (2009-191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ASB stated that if Coast Guard policy had any flexibility to allow retention of a member following a drug incident, the board would have recommended his reten- tion on active duty. The fact that the command later took action against the applicant after receiving evidence that he was accepting and filling prescriptions for opioid drugs without informing the prescribing physician of his addiction does not shock the Board’s sense of justice.7 The applicant alleged that his discharge was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02895

    Original file (BC-2004-02895.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Honor board members are allowed to consider all evidence. Counsel states that the point is that Academy doctors did evaluate the applicant correctly and in a timely manner and determined he had rheumatoid arthritis, but the Academy failed to follow up with the second medical review, which was stipulated in the first review. Counsel also seeks to clarify that the applicant “never stated that he contended that the Cadet Honor Board did not properly consider his medical problems.” The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022522

    Original file (20110022522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * subject OER * subject GOMOR * OER communication from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * HRC Notice of Show Cause * Notice of OMPF Filing Decision * Army Regulation 15-6 (Procedures for Investigating Officers and Boards or Officers) Investigation * Email, dated 5 June 2008 * Army Regulation 15-6 counter comments * four letters of support CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He made the following comments: * the initial contact happened in March 2008,...