AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01814A
The applicant was assigned to an active Air Force Reserve position on 20 October 1997 and has been subsequently promoted to the grade of technical sergeant, (E-6), Air Force Reserve, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 May 1998. He was promoted to E-5 on 1 May 1997. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After a thorough review of the evidence of record and counsel’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the applicant’s date of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01936
_________________________________________________________________ OFFICE OF PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY EVALUATION: The Chief, Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, advises that review of the applicant’s pay records shows he resigned from the Air Force Reserves with an effective date of August 2, 1996. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL EVALUATIONS: The Chief, Retirement Branch, HQ ARPC/DPAR,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02055
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Report and Queries Section, AFPC/DPAIS1, indicated that a review of the applicant’s duty history revealed that the upgrade to “Chief, Electronic Combat Systems” was entered into the PDS with an effective date of 1 Aug 94. A complete copy of the DPAIS1 evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Selection Board Secretariat, AFPC/DPPB, reviewed this application and indicated that they disagreed with the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02137
By letter, dated 2 Nov 96, the applicant was notified that since she had been twice considered and not recommended for promotion, the law required that her active status as an officer in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force be terminated not later than 15 Nov 96. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Promotions Branch,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02197
Specifically, they note the statement “If the OER/OPR does not agree with the requested changes, a request must be submitted to correct the OER/OPR.” A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and states that the officer preselection brief (OPB) is sent to each eligible officer several months prior to a selection board. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02411
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02411 INDEX CODE: 126.04 COUNSEL: GEORGE E. DAY HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 initiated on 23 Jul 96 and imposed on 26 Jul 96 be set aside and removed from his records, and that all rights, privileges, and benefits taken from him because of the Article 15 be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02439
Based on member’s application for the records correction, they will correct his account retroactive to 9 August 1991, six years from the date that he submitted his request for the records correction. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was not retired from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-20 on 1 September...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02445
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02525
The applicant states that an individual in his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was promoted to the grade of technical sergeant during cycle 97E6 with a lower total promotion score than he had scored. However, we note that unlike the applicant, the referenced individual was initially considered in AFSC 2A3X2B and was the only one in the AFSC who was initially selected for promotion with a total score of 326.04. Although the applicant contends he too should be promoted since his score was...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02548A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02548 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE On 26 March 1998, the Board considered and denied applicant's 10 May 1997 application requesting that (1) his discharge diagnosis, Axis I, be corrected to (a) Major Depression, without psychotic features, and (b) Brief Reactive Psychosis; (2) The...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02571A
However, members of this class, as well as the Classes of 1986 and 1987, received documented miscounseling concerning the DOPMA changes. AFPC/JA further states that concerning the first changed factors, as stated above, the Board has granted several USUHS Class of 1987 members constructive credit based on miscounseling/presumptive evidence of miscounseling and/or parity within their peer group. In requesting reconsideration, applicant further contends that despite his evidence that...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02608
The applicant states that at the time of his request to separate under the SSB program, only the SSB program allowed entrance into an active reserve status, without forfeiting any separation bonus. In accordance with the law at the time, VSI payments were recouped when Reserve pay was received; however, SSB payments were not. Further, since the recouped SSB funds could not be applied to out-year VSI payments, the Air Force effectively would be required to pay both SSB and VSI to...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02628
Action officers at AFPC do not make colonels’ assignments – they’re made by general officers. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and states the senior rater supports changing his promotion recommendation to a “Promote,” and provides a new, signed PRF for the board. Applicant's complete response, with...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02646
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02646 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of captain. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02712
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02726
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02730
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and noted that the applicant was seen by mental health providers shortly after starting basic training and was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder which interfered with her military duties/training and she was discharged because of the medical condition interfering with her training. A complete copy of the DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02769
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02808
He knows that one of these individuals was selected for promotion. Upon realizing this error, the Air Force canceled the individual’s promotion due to the fact that his total score was below the promotion cutoff of his correct AFSC (2A372); however, this individual’s promotion was reinstated through the appeal process. However, he has not provided sufficient evidence to persuade us that he was denied fair and equitable consideration for promotion or that his records were in error at the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02832
On 31 May 90, applicant was found guilty by his commander who imposed the following punishment: Reduction from the grade of sergeant to the grade of airman first class, forfeiture of $560 pay a month for two months, and 30 days’ correctional custody. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS, also reviewed this application and indicated that this case has been reviewed and the discharge was consistent with...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02848
Available records reflect that the applicant was retired from the Air Force Reserve on 16 December 1996 by reason of medical disqualification, in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6). However, we do not find evidence that the applicant’s commander approved a recommendation for promotion. Exhibit H. Medical Records.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02874
If the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) determines that the applicant was demoted voluntarily (without cause) to enter active duty, their advice would be for the AFBCMR to advance the applicant to the rank of TSgt at the 30-year point. Exhibit B. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR 97-02874 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02878
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Military Personnel Division, Air Force Reserve Command, HQ AFRC/DPM, states that there was no medical documentation provided for Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command, Surgeon General (HQ AFRC/SGPS) to review previously nor with this request for correction of military records which supports applicant’s claim that his back problems are associated with his duty in Germany. The Consultant...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02914
However, anyone reviewing the applicant’s record of trial can easily identify the victims in this case to be the airmen targeted by the applicant and the United States Air Force. In JAJM’s view, the applicant’s lack of judgment, self-discipline and respect for the military’s code of conduct could only have led to contempt from those enlisted members, and any other enlisted personnel who became aware of the applicant’s actions. ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02960
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02960 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY94A (22 Aug 94) Major Board (P0494A), with a corrected officer selection record (OSR). As to the MSM, he feels the MSM should...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02986
On 19 May 97, applicant was advised of her commander’s intent to impose nonjudicial punishment upon her under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for her alleged misconduct in violation of Article 134 for the following offense: at or near McGuire AFB, on or about 29 Apr 97, being disorderly in that she engaged in a verbal tirade and threw a handful of dental instruments out a doorway. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02992
A complete copy of the DPPPEB evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed this application and recommended denial. DPPPA indicated they concurred with AFPC/DPPPEB that the applicant has failed to provide evidence necessary to support his claims of error in his appeal. A complete copy of the JA evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, counsel...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02996
There are no provisions of law to allow payment of retired pay unless the member has met all requirements to receive such pay. And, finally, it is important to note that numerous prior military personnel have been granted VA disability compensation entitlement following receipt of either Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) or SSB separation pay. While the applicant has not provided evidence that Air Force officials miscounseled him, in view of the short period of time needed to become...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03007A
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit H. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, we determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s request that the AF Form 418 be declared void and removed from his records. Reenlistment in the Air Force is a privilege and not a right. Only those individuals who consistently demonstrate the qualities necessary for...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03030
A complete copy of the DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response, the applicant indicated that she never served in Italy as indicated in Medical Consultant’s advisory. According to the Medical Consultant, the applicant’s records did not specifically state where her temporary duties (TDYs) were served other than noting she was assigned to Combined Task Force 6 at one point,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03032
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Joint...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03075
Had an MEB been initiated and presented to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) during the time frame just prior to his release, the Board would have found him unfit for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a 20% disability rating. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Claims Branch, Directorate of Debt and Claims Management, DFAS-DE/FYCC, states that after a thorough review of the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03145
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that an injustice exists; the request to fix the law is in process, according to ARPC. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03180
He was not absent without leave (AWOL) [the basis for the Article 15] because he had a third amended order, dated 9 January 1997, that extended his TDY at Wilford Hall Medical Center (WHMC), Lackland AFB, for a total of 176 days, and was given verbal authorization to remain TDY after his medical evaluation board (MEB) was concluded. A copy of the complete Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, evaluated the appeal and stated that the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03198
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the two Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 5 July 1989 and 5 July 1990 should be voided and removed from his records; the Overseas Duty History portion of the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) should be changed; or, that a signed copy of the citation of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) should be inserted into the OSR. Although the overseas duty history was not reflected on the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03224
INDEX CODE: 112.05, 112.08 AFBCMR 97-03224 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03256
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the Field...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03257
She be retroactive promoted to the grade of 0-4 (major), which should have occurred during the Fiscal Year 1996 (FY96) Reserve of the Air Force Line/Health Professionals Board, that convened at Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) on 6 - 10 March 1995. The investigation did in fact conclude and recommend in your favor.” In support of the appeal, applicant submits HQ ARPC/IG Letter, Request for TIG investigation, and Investigating Officer’s Reports. While this Board agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03260A
On 29 June 1998, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of the Board’s decision through his Congressman (Exhibit F). Accordingly, his request for reconsideration was denied (Exhibit G). Exhibit G. Letter from SAF/LLI to C/M McNulty, dated 3 Sep 98.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03281
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: At the time the events under review commenced, the applicant was serving on active duty in the grade of lieutenant colonel, with a date of rank of 1 January 1992. The Personnel Council, on behalf of the Secretary, determined that the applicant had not served satisfactorily in the grade of lieutenant colonel and, therefore, directed retirement in the grade of major. The evidence of record reflects that,...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03363
(Exhibit C) The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03390
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03390 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: STEPHEN J. DUNN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE On 21 April 1998, the Board considered and denied applicant's 11 July 1997 application requesting that (1) her uncharacterized discharge be changed to a medical discharge; (2) a referral to a Physical Evaluation Board...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03414
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, Enlisted Promotion and Military Testing Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPWB, states that the applicant was demoted from staff sergeant to senior airman effective and with a date of rank of 3 June 1994 in accordance with AFR 39-30 for failure to maintain weight within Air Force standards. A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit E. The Chief, Retirements Branch, HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03417
His corrected record receive supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of master sergeant (E-7) for cycle 97E7. Per message, dated 29 Sep 97, officials at the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), Promotion Management Section, Randolph AFB, Texas, informed the applicant that the documentation provided did not clearly establish that a decoration recommendation was placed into official channels prior to the date promotion selections were made and disapproved applicant’s request for...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03436
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03445
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPJA, reviewed this application and states that at the present time, under the ROPMA, they do not have the authority to hold SSBs for PV promotions. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, to include the...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03457
Applicant acknowledged receipt of the Letter of Notification on 19 September 1994 and on 20 September 1994 stated that she had been notified of the recommendation for discharge action for a Personality Disorder and of the specific basis of the proposed discharge. Applicant was discharged from the Regular Air Force on 17 October 1994 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Personality Disorder) with an honorable discharge. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03479
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retirements Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Mgmt, AFPC/DPPRR, reviewed the application and states that an audit confirmed member had accumulated 19 years, 5 months, and 11 days for active duty credit; therefore, he did not have the required 20 years and 1 day required for service retirement eligibility. If he understands correctly what that block means, it means he has 240 months of...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03534
Interestingly, the summary of applicant’s hospitalization in 1981 that resulted in his being placed on that medication describes his appearance as “mildly obese” and further review of records shows that his enlistment physical examination in Feb 71 recorded his weight at 213 pounds, well over weight standards at the time he was allowed to join the Air Force. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Chief, Inquiries/AFBCMR Section, AFPC/DPPPWB, reviewed...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03671
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, copies of his transcript, enlistment documents, extracts from 10 USC 2107, an Air Force Times article, and other documents associated with the matter under review. DPPRR indicated that after a review of the applicant's military service record, they were unable to establish the fact that he was enlisted in the Army Reserve to attend the ROTC program at Middle Tennessee State University. We took notice of the applicant's...