Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8947-13
Original file (NR8947-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

7015. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN :
Docket No:NR0Q8947-13
24 February 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: QP __ ep

Ref: . (a). Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

_Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo: 1430 Ser 12/0036

of

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that. the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-4 from the August 2009 Navy- wide Reserve .
advancement exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ZsSalman, Exnicios and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice _
on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined |
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by. the Board consisted of:the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts. of record
pertaining to. Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy

b In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidenée of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where SRP Sep EIeeey
as nan i
a

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-4/LS3 from the August : 2009
Navy-wide advancement Reserve exam with an effective date of ™!

(GREEN wich 2 Tine In Rate date cf

NOTE: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-4 may
also impact on Petitioner! s E-5 advancement opportunities. If
Petitioner was eligible for, but did not take an E-5 examination
because the above change had not yet been made, the following
procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. ,
Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of
advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have
' been first eligible. A DD Form 149, a command
-endorsement/recommendation, cycle profile sheets, a worksheet,
and a copy of this letter must be included with the request.
The Board will determine whether the request will be approved.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4.- Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Que MONTGOMERY
Recorder . . Acting fi

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
_6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6{(e))

and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
_ authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the: Navy.

24 February 2014 —
TTR pape °
. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN

Acting Executive Director

te

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13

    Original file (NR8582-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    requesting, in é¢ffect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8459-13

    Original file (NR8459-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13

    Original file (NR8343-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6384-13

    Original file (NR6384-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve “advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07108-09

    Original file (07108-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5700 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MAl from the February 2008 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7626 13

    Original file (NR7626 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13

    Original file (NR8585 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14

    Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13

    Original file (NR9104 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR735 14

    Original file (NR735 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to IT2/E-5 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to...