DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
. Docket No:NR06384-13—
24 February 2014
‘From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Tos: Secretary of the Navy
Sb ea
Po
‘Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.¢. 1552
Enél: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0015
of Si >
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-5 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve
“advancement exam.
2. . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
’ considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, . and applicable statutes, ‘regulations and policies.
°3. The. Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to. this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy
b In correspondence attached as enclosure (2)., the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
- especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
‘RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’ Ss naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/OQM2 from the Qyyp
Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam with an effective date of gap —
CE with a Time In Rate date of si
NOTE: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-5 may
also impact on Petitioner’s E-6 advancement opportunities. If
Petitioner was eligible for, but did, not take an E-6 examination
because the above change had not yet been made, the following
procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. »
Petitioner may reapply to this Board for, consideration of
advancement to E-6 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have
been first eligible. A DD Form 149, a command
endorsement /recommendation, cycle profile sheets, a worksheet,
and a copy of this letter must be included with the request...
The Board will determine whether the request will be approved.
‘b, That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4. . Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723. 6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is. a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ue A MONTG¢ ER
Recorder ' . Acting Recorder
5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
24 February 2014 _-
: rn OD, {Annan
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13
requesting, in é¢ffect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8459-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13
Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8947-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ZsSalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice _ on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined | that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. , Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have ' been first eligible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7626 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7766 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MC2 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam and transferred to the Active Status Pool (ASP) of the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) as an E-5/MC2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...