DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NR08343-13
24 February 2014.
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 ,
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Wavy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Sex 811/026
fe
1. Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement
exam.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record.. Documentary material
considered by the Board. consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, ahd applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3 The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’ 8 allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies availabie under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Neniy-
b In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
-Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’ s naval record be corrected,: where appropriate,
-as follows: >
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the Ga?
Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of _.
with a Time In Rate date of Qi.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’ s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. cnt Bubactae } . MONT MER
Recorder | Acting Recorder
5. . Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
-and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on —
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
24 February 2014,
ROBERT D. ASALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13
requesting, in é¢ffect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8459-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8947-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ZsSalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice _ on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined | that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. , Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have ' been first eligible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6384-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve “advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5315 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to grade his March .2014 Navy-wide advancement exam to his-September 2013 missed exam cycle. The Board, consisting ¢ ny reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4426 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS an4.& SOURTHOUSF RO SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NR04426-14 15 October 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tow Secretary of the Navy Ret: (a) Title 10 U.s.c. -Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to H-6/YNi from the February 2013...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7570 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was entitled to a Performance Mark Average (PMA) score of 3.80 vice 3.73 for a Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) point of .5 for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ruskin and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2014 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7626 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...