DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TUR
Docket No: 3704-11
30 November 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
late father’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title
10, United States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 November 2011. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your father’s naval record
and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition,
the Board considered the correspondence furnished by the Marine
Corps Military Awards Branch (MMMA-3) and the awards entitlement
transmittal furnished by the Navy Personnel Command Retired
Records Section (PERS-312D2), copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the documents furnished
by MMMA-3 and PERS-31D2. Be advised that the Board does not have
the authority to create, recreate, upgrade, or issue awards or
the citations thereto; nor does it maintain the documentation for
which individual awards or citations are presented to Navy and/or
Marine Corps personnel. Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
LO Soon
W. DEAN PF R
Executive rector
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory In this connection, the Board substantially You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06183-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. YOU are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05096-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06386-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03493-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. confinement at hard labor for 75 days, forfeitures of $382 per month for two months, On 10 November 1983, the convening authority approved the adjudged sentence and ordered its execution. You received the other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07402-01
In this connection, the Board substantially Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1650 MMMA-3 8NovOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECO RDS (BCNR) Subj: R ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE OF‘ FORMER MARINE During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple 1. Heart...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01
Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...