Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03493-02
Original file (03493-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

WMP
Docket No:
11 December 2002

3493-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
advisory opinion dated 5 November 2002 from the Awards Branch,
Headquarters Marine Corps,

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted

Your allegations of error and

The Board also considered the

a copy of which is enclosed.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 17 July
1980 for four years at age 17.
Your record reflects that you
served without incident until 15 April 1981, when you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to obey a lawful order.
The punishment imposed was a forfeiture of $100.

On 26 September 1983 you were convicted by a special 
martial of wrongful use of marijuana.
confinement at hard labor for 75 days, forfeitures of $382 per
month for two months,
On 10
November 1983, the convening authority approved the adjudged
sentence and ordered its execution.

court-
You were sentenced to

and reduction to 

paygrade E-l.

Prior to submitting this request, you conferred with a

You were then an unauthorized absentee from 9 January to 29
On 30 March 1984, you
February 1984, a period of 51 days.
submitted a request for an other than honorable discharge in
lieu of trial by court-martial for this period of 
absence.
qualified military lawyer and were advised of your rights and
warned of the probable adverse consequences of accepting such a
discharge.
approved by the discharge authority.
action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction
and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge and
confinement at hard labor.
You received the other than
honorable discharge on 30 April 1984.

On 13 April 1984 your request for discharge was

As a result of such

unaut.horized

The Board also believed that considerable

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity, and your contention that you completed over three
years service without incident.
Nevertheless, the Board found
that your 51 days of unauthorized absence and ensuing request
for discharge clearly warranted an other than honorable
discharge, especially when your prior disciplinary record is
taken into account.
clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to
avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action,
you escaped the possibility of confinement at hard labor and a
punitive discharge.
received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your
request for discharge was granted and you should not be
permitted to change it now.
Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments set forth in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

Further, the Board concluded that you

Concerning your entitlement to the

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by

You are entitled to have

2

In this regard,

the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

S

HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORP
ROAD

2280 RUSSELL
QUANTICO,  VIRGINIA

 
  22 

134-3 

I03

IN REPLY REFER TO:

165 0
MMMA-3
5 Nov 02

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

.

NION(S) IN THE CASE OF
ORMER 

MARINE

Subj:

A review of the records reveal that
1.
convicted by a Special Court Martial on
offenses committed during the period July 17, 1980 to July 16,
1983.
Since the offense occurred within the 3-year period, he
would not be entitled to a Good Conduct Medal.

The point of contact at MMMA 

2.
784-9340.

is

t



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00573-07

    Original file (00573-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00103-02

    Original file (00103-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The record reflects that you served without incident until December 1980 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for possession of marijuana.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03322-02

    Original file (03322-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 August 1983, your record Although your record further reflects that you were an unauthorized absentee from 18 to 20 October 1983, a period of two days, it does not indicate if disciplinary action was taken. However,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05258 12

    Original file (05258 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and, on 25 June 1984, you received an OTH discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06537-02

    Original file (06537-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 14 such as your youth and The Board carefully weighed all In its review of your case, potentially mitigating factors, immaturity and the length of time that has passed since you were discharged from the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00173 12

    Original file (00173 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05792-07

    Original file (05792-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 2 December 1980 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board concluded...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08262-00

    Original file (08262-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2001. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three NJPs and special court—martial conviction, and the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court-martial for two prolonged periods of UA totalling nearly a year. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02859-05

    Original file (02859-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were discharged on 20 December 1984 with an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02274-11

    Original file (02274-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...