Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06386-01
Original file (06386-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 6386-01
2 November 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 17 September
2001, a copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board substantially

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction  of an official naval
record, the burden is on  the applicant to demonstrate the
existence  of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2

! DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

HEADQUARTERS UN

I TED STATES MAR

3280  RUSSELL ROAD

Y

I NE CORPS

QUANT

I CO ,  V I RG I N IA 22134-51

03

 

I N REPLY REFER TO

:

1650
MMMA-3
17SepOl

MEMORANDUM FOR

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS  

(BCNR)

Subj:

REQUEST

FOR ADVISORY OPINION(S)' IN THE CASE OF
FORMER MARINE

We have reviewed the documents provided, and based upon this

1.
information, he is not entitled to the Armed Forces
Expeditionary Medal,
30-days support in either Operation Joint Endeavor or Joint
Guard in the Former Republic of Yugoslavia.

he did not meet the eligibility criteria of

Marine Security Guard personnel were not assigned in support

2.
of either operations, therefore,
awards authorized for a specific operation.
Guard personnel would have to be recommended by the operation
commander in his submission for the award, these personnel were
not recommended to participate in the Armed Forces Expeditionary
Medal.

they would not qualify for any

Marine Security

3 .

A point of contact at MMMA is Mr.

@ 784-9210

.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08175-00

    Original file (08175-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 1 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Review of he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07733-00

    Original file (07733-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of his service and medical records, and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01074-01

    Original file (01074-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2001, a copy of which is attached. they were not present and cannot attest Statements from which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04968-00

    Original file (04968-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. of the officers and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit by requesting copies of the unit rosters for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00177-01

    Original file (00177-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS ROA D 3280 RUSSELL QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1650 MMMA-3 30ctOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) Subj: ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE OF FORMER MARINE During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple 1. a review of his service and medical records, Since there is no indication in the records of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01

    Original file (03975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02593-02

    Original file (02593-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Our most recent reply is the Purple Heart Medal is not awarded for Combat Without the required two eyewitness statements to forwarded as enclosure (2). if he can provide the required two As previously stated, records fail to Without these : _. . ’ served in the Marine Corps, the During the perio Purple Heart was authorized for award to those who were wounded .as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United or injured States or an opposing armed force of a foreign county in which the.Armed.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01

    Original file (06369-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory In this connection, the Board substantially You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07402-01

    Original file (07402-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this connection, the Board substantially Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1650 MMMA-3 8NovOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECO RDS (BCNR) Subj: R ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE OF‘ FORMER MARINE During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple 1. Heart...