Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11628-10
Original file (11628-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 11628-10
29 Mar 11

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March
2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered
the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 7110 Ser N130D/11U0144 of
23 Feb 11, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You
originally contracted for the CTM rating with a $7,000 Enlistment
Bonus (Annex A to the DD Form 4). As required by OPNAVINST 1160,
which governs the Enlistment Bonus (EB) program, a 12 month extension
was reflected. Due to a change in your original ship date a new
contract (Annex B) was executed. Annex B reflects the CTM rating,
with no bonus, and no extension. You signed this contract on 27 April
2009. You are now alleging that per GENADMIN 1920092 MARO9 (which
should be 151726Z JANO9, the message in effect when you executed Annex
B) a change in ship date “cannot modify or change the bonus amount in
a contract.” The message actually states that “Page-13 entries cannot
modify or change the bonus amounts on an existing contract.” In this
connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
Docket No. 11628-10

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99

    Original file (01669-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 N130Dl/ 141-99 03 AUG 99 NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05688-03

    Original file (05688-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. 03UO658 5420 N130D1/ 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : E OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05688-03 with microfiche service record provides comment and recommendation on petition. enters the DEP and the day the member ships to active duty, determines the amount of EB a member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08167-01

    Original file (08167-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. '/Q2W%WTo MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: record ( 1 ) BCNR case file #08167-01 with microfiche service ing provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04584-02

    Original file (04584-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 231454AUG99, (message in effect at the time Petty Officer Siienaiaie.. entered the DEP), the NF Program Was eligible for an EB of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08838-10

    Original file (08838-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. To change the contract, Petitioner executed NAVCRUIT 1133/52, Annex C to the DD Form 4. The entry of “NAVY COLLEGE FUND GUARANTEE $21000.00 (JUN 09)” in the NAVCRUIT 1133/52, Annex C must necessarily be an erroneous combination of the three possible options.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01

    Original file (07068-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00177-03

    Original file (00177-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04578-01

    Original file (04578-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 Sep 2001 OlU1248 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : Encl: record COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER USN (1) BCNR case file #04578-01 with microfiche service The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Office N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer-petition for 2. an Enlistment Bonus (EB) as he has already received his EB. and the day a member ships to active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04588-02

    Original file (04588-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘I JLP: ddj Docket No: 4588-02 8 October 2002 This is in reference provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. to.your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04123-03

    Original file (04123-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 20350-200 Y IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N130D1/03U0651 10 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #0412,3-03 with microfiche service record ng provides comment and...