Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08150-10
Original file (08150-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

MEH
Docket No. 8150-10

975

27 Sep 10

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
: .

to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

record pursuant

A three-member panel of t!} Boar Por rrection of Naval Records,

your application on 27
r 2 ). Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
ccordance wit! inistrative r i ions and procedures
i ard. DeCinimaraey material
he Board consisted of your application, together with
43 -

val record and

 

ed in support thereo!
tes, regulations and polici

advisory opinion furnished by
of 14 Sep 10, a copy of which is attached.

   

 

ious consideration of the entire record,
n

 

ridence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error ol injustice. In
this connection, the Board substant lly concurred with the comments

santainad in the advisory opinion. Tt was also noted that on 26 June
2009 you signed the encios sed NAVCRUIT 1133/102, Enlist f

Understanding, indicating you were enlisting for the

my

 

with an Enlistment Bonus of “$0.” Accordingly, your
been denied. The names and votes of the members of
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

 

avorable action cannot be taken. are entitled to have the Board
f
A

new and material evidence

 

reconsider its decision upon submission o

or other matter not previously col the Boarc. In this
regard, it is also important tc that a presumption of
ri attaches to all offic

   

7”
Docket No. 8150-10

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.

W. DEAN PFEIRFE
Executive Di

   
  

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8150-13

    Original file (NR8150-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official - Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02038-02

    Original file (02038-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In view of the above facts, there is no basis for expungement of his military record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8150 13

    Original file (NR8150 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You elected to consult with legal counsel and subsequently requested an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03

    Original file (05675-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04060-03

    Original file (04060-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03U0679 24 Sep 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF 0 Y Encl : (1) BCNR case file #04060-03 The following provides comment and recommendation on petition. requests favorable action that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05106-03

    Original file (05106-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130C3103U0637 dated 5 September 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02090-03

    Original file (02090-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 5 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01678-99

    Original file (01678-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05947-03

    Original file (05947-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, ' when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. No correction to his Marine Corps record is reauired.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01378-07

    Original file (01378-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1378-07 19 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...