Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03460-10
Original file (03460-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Ph ) BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS"
f 2 NAVY ANNEX Docket No. 03460-10

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 31 January 2011

   

 
       

4

st e

a = alts
a ry SW

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21
January 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the
Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that
it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. Although you claim
you discovered the alleged error or injustice in your record on 8
March 2008, the Board concluded that 15 July 1983, when you were
separated from the Navy with a bad conduct discharge, you knew that
you had been discharged without entitlement to disability benefits
administered by the Department of the Navy. In addition, the Board
noted that your punitive discharge would have precluded you from
being referred to the Navy Disability Evaluation System at that time.

You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application

is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.

Sincerely,

La Sen

W. DEAN P R
Executive ‘Di ror

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03649-10

    Original file (03649-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DO 20370-5100 : JRE Docket No. 03649-10 14 January 2011 “Shes This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07398-10

    Original file (07398-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03243-10

    Original file (03243-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011. The Board found that you were aware of the alleged error or injustice in your record when you were discharged under honorable conditions in 1966. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00442-10

    Original file (00442-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. Although you state that you discovered the alleged error or injustice in 2009, the Board concluded that you knew in 1976 that you had been discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11982-10

    Original file (11982-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03654-10

    Original file (03654-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. It found that you knew in 1978 that you had been separated with entitlement to disability severance pay rather than retired. In addition, it noted that you did not present any evidence that is probative of your contention to the effect that your disability was ratable at 30% or higher at that time.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR782 13

    Original file (NR782 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    782-13 16 January 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application vag not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest - ‘Fh oO WM 4 of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in @ timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09532-10

    Original file (09532-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2011. Furthermore, a Palomar Medical Center discharge summary covering the 7-11 November 1992 period indicates that your blood alcohol level was 158 milligrams percent when you were admitted there on 7 November 1992. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12093-10

    Original file (12093-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07801-05

    Original file (07801-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. The Board concluded that on 11 February 1988, you knew that you had been examined and found fit for separation on 29 December 1982, and that you were being...