DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECOMDE
2 NAVY ANNEX Docket No. 00442-10
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 11 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3
February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the
Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that
it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. Although you state
that you discovered the alleged error or injustice in 2009, the Board
concluded that you knew in 1976 that you had been discharged without
entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department
of the Navy. The fact that your lengthy and disqualifying
pre-service history of a psychotic disorder was not identified by
Navy medical authorities during your one month of service was not
considered probative of the existence of error or injustice in your
record.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN’ P
Executive rector
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12093-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11982-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03460-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Ph ) BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS" f 2 NAVY ANNEX Docket No. In addition, the Board noted that your punitive discharge would have precluded you from being referred to the Navy Disability Evaluation System at that time. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03654-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. It found that you knew in 1978 that you had been separated with entitlement to disability severance pay rather than retired. In addition, it noted that you did not present any evidence that is probative of your contention to the effect that your disability was ratable at 30% or higher at that time.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00450-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX JRE WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07435-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2011. The reentry code assigned by the Navy is not binding upon the other services, which are free to accept or reject an application on the basis of ‘their own standards# If another branch of service decides to ‘waive your reentryt code and accept you for enlistment, the Navy will not object. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03243-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011. The Board found that you were aware of the alleged error or injustice in your record when you were discharged under honorable conditions in 1966. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07398-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03649-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DO 20370-5100 : JRE Docket No. 03649-10 14 January 2011 “Shes This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09532-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2011. Furthermore, a Palomar Medical Center discharge summary covering the 7-11 November 1992 period indicates that your blood alcohol level was 158 milligrams percent when you were admitted there on 7 November 1992. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.