DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No. 11982-10
14 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3
February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the
Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that
it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. In addition, it noted
that there is no indication your naval record that you were unfit
for duty by reason of physical disability on 24 march 1955, when you
were administratively discharged by reason of your unsuitability and
lack of motivation for service.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
May pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
‘2
. »
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12093-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a timely manner. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03654-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. It found that you knew in 1978 that you had been separated with entitlement to disability severance pay rather than retired. In addition, it noted that you did not present any evidence that is probative of your contention to the effect that your disability was ratable at 30% or higher at that time.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00442-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. Although you state that you discovered the alleged error or injustice in 2009, the Board concluded that you knew in 1976 that you had been discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04458-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 January 2011. As noted above, you were found fit for duty by the PEB, and you accepted that finding, which suggests that you felt that you were fit for duty at that time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04435-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which voted three to one in favor of an administrative honorable discharge due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00450-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX JRE WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03672-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11165-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05180-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2011. Your receipt of disability ratings from the VA for conditions not rated by the Department of the Navy is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record because the VA assigned those ratings without regard to the issue of your fitness for military duty vis-a-vis those conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03582-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material gubmitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...