DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 07398-10
21 January 2011
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13
January 2011. After careful consideration of your application, the
Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that
it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure
to submit your application in a timely manner. In this regard, the
Board found that you knew in i976 that you were being discharged
because of pseudofolliculitis barbae, a condition not considered a
disability under the laws administered by the military departments.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request must
include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably
available to you when you submitted your application. The evidence
may pertain to the timeliness of your application or to its merits.
Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application
is not possible. . :
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
lLaPpord )
W. DEAN PFANF
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03460-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Ph ) BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS" f 2 NAVY ANNEX Docket No. In addition, the Board noted that your punitive discharge would have precluded you from being referred to the Navy Disability Evaluation System at that time. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03649-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DO 20370-5100 : JRE Docket No. 03649-10 14 January 2011 “Shes This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03243-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011. The Board found that you were aware of the alleged error or injustice in your record when you were discharged under honorable conditions in 1966. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07874-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07623-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2011. At that time you were not recommended for retention or reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04227-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN _ Docket No: 04227-10 13 January 2011 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2011. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08545-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04204-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01713-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting im executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2011. The Board further neted that the waiver document you provided is dated 2 April 2006, the same date as the Body Composition Assessment (BCA) you failed in cycle 1, 2006, so the Board was unable to find the waiver was in effect when that BCA was conducted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11342-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, and notwithstanding the favorable advisory opinion dated 27 January 2011, the...